Remember When MSNBC Went Bananas Over This NHL Player Not Accepting a WH...
Teens Say AI Is Now Part Of Everyday Life–Many Parents Have No Idea
Joy Behar Thinks the SAVE Act Will Help Republicans Cheat in November
The Left Wants a Nuclear Family Meltdown
Tim Walz's Paid Medical and Family Leave Law Is Already Being Abused
Grand Rapids Mayor: People Should Be Made to Feel Shame for Having Guns
The Legendary Ending to President Trump's State of the Union
President Trump Just Responded to Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib's Outbursts at the...
JD Vance Reveals What He Saw From Democrats During the State of the...
Mamdani's NYC Flirts With Chaos
U.S. Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Michigan County’s $2,242 Tax Foreclosure on $194k...
Moreno Unveils Bill to Fine Welfare Recipients $100K for Sending Money Overseas
Feds Freeze $259M in Medicaid Funds to Minnesota Over Alleged Fraud
Florida Man Sentenced to 6 Years in Nationwide Bank Fraud Scheme
Memphis Woman Sentenced to Federal Prison for $560K COVID-19 Fraud Across 20 States
Tipsheet

United Nations Takes Kremlin's Side, Bans Mention of Russia's 'War' or 'Invasion' of Ukraine

United Nations Takes Kremlin's Side, Bans Mention of Russia's 'War' or 'Invasion' of Ukraine
Manuel Elias/United Nations via AP

After failing to do anything meaningful to prevent Vladimir Putin from invading Ukraine or bombing civilians with prohibited munitions, the United Nations is now apparently trying to avoid insulting Russia by banning the use of the words "war" or "invasion" when talking about Russia's invasion and current war against Ukraine. 

Advertisement

It's pathetic, laughable, tragic, and entirely on brand for the useless muppets who think China belongs on the Human Rights Council and Russia should serve as the President of its Security Council — a body committed "to the maintenance of international peace and security" — at the time it violently invades another country.

The U.N. acting as speech police rather than doing anything meaningful to curtail Putin's deadly European power trip was first reported by The Irish Times as "a move to balance political sensitivities as powerful member state Russia cracks down domestically on those who use the words."

So, yes — the United Nations, which already allowed Putin to run roughshod over Ukraine's border and continue to bomb the living daylights out of residential areas and government buildings, is now taking their fealty to another level and acquiescing to the Kremlin's thugs. 

Advertisement

Related:

PUTIN RUSSIA UKRAINE

"UN staff have been instructed to use the terms 'conflict' or 'military offensive' to describe Russia’s invasion of its neighbour, which has killed hundreds of civilians and forced two million to flee the country," according to an internal U.N. email reviewed by The Irish Times:

“[Use] ‘conflict’ or ‘military offensive’ and NOT ‘war’ or ‘invasion’ when referring to the situation in Ukraine.”

It further banned staff from adding the Ukrainian flag to social media profiles or websites, something that has become a common expression of solidarity with the country since it was invaded on February 24th.

“Do NOT add the Ukrainian flag to personal or official social media accounts or websites,” the email read.

The communications policy was explained in the email as a way to avoid “reputational risk”.

“This is an important reminder that we, as international civil servants, have a responsibility to be impartial,” the email read. “There is a serious possibility of reputational risk that has been flagged by senior officials recently.”

The language policy has fuelled concern that the organisation is going too far to avoid offending Russia, a powerful member state that holds one of the five permanent seats on the UN Security Council.

Advertisement

Gee, ya think the United Nations is going too far in appeasing Russia amid its unprovoked attack on Ukraine when it's following the Kremlin's rules for how to refer to the war Putin's waging?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos