Nancy Pelosi Has Been Hospitalized
Bombshell: The FBI Spied on Kash Patel
Did a Drone Crash in New Jersey?
Reports: Pelosi's Injuries in Luxembourg Are Quite Serious
Tulsi Gabbard the Latest Victim of the Media's 'Not Going Well' Narrative Regarding...
Mayor Eric Adams Mulling a Special Order to Bypass NYC's Illegal Alien Protections
West Point Is a Woke Train Wreck
New Jersey, Minnesota Sue Company For Making Popular Product
Washington State Looks to Make It as Hard as Possible to Buy Guns
NJ Sheriff Calls on Governor to Declare a State of Emergency Over Drone...
Amazon, Meta Donate $1 Million to Trump’s Inaugural Fund
Trump Has the Ultimate Surprise For Daniel Penny
For the First Time In a Decade, Trump Sees a Positive Favorability Rating
One Sport Just Dropped the Hammer on Transgender Athletes
Weak: Canada's Leftist Leader Showcases Phony 'Feminism' With Hypocritical Dig at Trump
Tipsheet

'Facially Invalid': SCOTUS Slaps Down CA Donor Disclosure Requirement

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

In a 6-3 opinion issued Thursday morning, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a California requirement for charitable organizations to turn over information on donors is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

The opinion of the Court — authored by Chief Justice John Roberts — in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, Attorney General of California, found that "California’s disclosure requirement is facially invalid because it burdens donors’ First Amendment rights and is not narrowly tailored to an important government interest."

The invalidated measure required charities in California to turn over names of their largest donors to the state, something conservatives say would allow liberal authorities to target conservative donors while dissuading individuals from giving to conservative causes, a fact the majority noted:

"We are left to conclude that the Attorney General’s disclosure requirement imposes a widespread burden on donors’ associational rights. And this burden cannot be justified on the ground that the regime is narrowly tailored to investigating charitable wrongdoing, or that the State’s interest in administrative convenience is sufficiently important."

The Americans for Prosperity Foundation gained widespread support for their position against California's donor disclosure requirement and had hundreds of individuals and organizations "representing a range of issues including religious liberties, LGBTQ rights, free speech, racial justice, animal welfare, international aid, tax reform, and human rights" file friend-of-the-court briefs with the Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

"A common theme emanates from their briefs: privacy rights are a hallmark of America and protecting them is vital to ensuring people can continue to make progress toward realizing its founding ideals," AFPF stated.

In her dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that "Today’s decision discards decades of First Amendment jurisprudence recognizing that reporting and disclosure requirements do not directly burden associational rights."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement