Pro-Hamas Supporters Tried Ambushing a GOP Congresswoman. She Shut Them Down.
Let Them Destroy Each Other
Biden’s a Boon for America’s Foes
Seems Odd That Democrats Still Don’t Get This About Trump
Unveiling the Myth: Democrats, PRRI, and the Christian Nationalist Specter
Bibi Ignores Biden
This Has Never Been About Justice
MSNBC Host: Donald Trump, Like Richard Nixon, Is Racist
If You Can't Tell the Bad Guy in Israel Versus Hamas, You're the...
Why Communism and Socialism Fail
Defying Odds, Biden Figures Out a Way to Make Federal Permitting Law Even...
The 'Death to America' Crowd
A Message to VP Kamala Harris- Respect the Other Side of Choice
The 'Death to America' Crowd
The Most Dangerous People in America: College Professors
Tipsheet

You Won't Believe How Chris Wray Wriggled Out Of Rand Paul's Question About Payments To Twitter

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Tuesday, so fireworks weren't at all unexpected when it came time for that committee's ranking Republican, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, to ask questions.

Advertisement

Predictably, the exchange on the collusion of government and social media to limit speech did not disappoint.

Paul confronted Wray on whether or not the FBI paid Twitter around $3 million for content moderation, an allegation that came to light late last year with the release of the "Twitter files" documents.

"Did the FBI pay Twitter money to moderate content moderation?" Paul asked.

"I’m not aware of us paying money to moderate content there or anywhere else," Wray responded.

"What was the $3 million for that the FBI gave that’s been revealed in the 'Twitter files' which has been characterized by those writing the 'Twitter files' as payment for content moderation?" Paul pressed before asking Wray directly if he was "aware of the payment."

"I am not aware of that specific payment but I can tell you that when it comes to payments, going back well over four decades when we are required by federal law, when a company like in this instance a provider goes through expenses to produce information, we are required to reimburse them for those expenses, and so I think a lot of the questions about payments revolve around exactly that."

In other words, it's just a standard payment for "expenses," or something, the usual back and forth between government agencies and private companies. Totally normal, boring stuff.

Advertisement

Paul went on to grill Wray as well as Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on whether or not government agencies are actively engaged in attempting to censor social media content about issues like vaccine and mask efficacy, Hunter Biden's laptop, and other issues which, according to Paul, "have nothing to do with national security," a charge they both denied.

Wray admitted that the nature of meetings with social media "have changed fundamentally" in the wake of a federal court injunction.

"That's sort of an acknowledgement that perhaps you weren't just talking about national security, child pornography, and human trafficking, right?" Paul asked.

Wray denied Paul’s assertion by insisting they changed their behavior "out of an abundance of caution" to be sure and not violate the injunction, which he pointed out has since been stayed by the Supreme Court.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement