It's About Time Democrats Are Finally Calling Themselves Socialists
CNN's Interview With Graham Platner's Accuser Is an Election-Killing Moment
Watch Scott Jennings Nuke the Dems' Narrative on Graham Platner in Less Than...
CNN Guest Can't Fathom How Dems Thought This Was an Acceptable Answer From...
Graham Platner Just Experienced His Own Political 'Bagration'
Platner's Rape Allegations Rehash a Nasty Rule Dems Follow Regarding These Stories
Democreeps Only Believe Women When It’s Useful to Them
Here's One of the Names Being Floated As a Replacement for Graham Platner
French President Macron Safe After Bombing Near His Hotel in Syria
How Mike Rowe's 'Build Freedom' Aims to Restore the Dignity of American Work
Mamdani's Twisted View of America
Chicago’s Violence Interruption Industry Faces Questions After Homicides Tick Up
Culture Still Matters
How My Father Mastered Cooling Our House Without Air Conditioning
The Tyrant’s Funeral Cannot Bury the Truth
Tipsheet

You Won't Believe How Chris Wray Wriggled Out Of Rand Paul's Question About Payments To Twitter

You Won't Believe How Chris Wray Wriggled Out Of Rand Paul's Question About Payments To Twitter
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Tuesday, so fireworks weren't at all unexpected when it came time for that committee's ranking Republican, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, to ask questions.

Advertisement

Predictably, the exchange on the collusion of government and social media to limit speech did not disappoint.

Paul confronted Wray on whether or not the FBI paid Twitter around $3 million for content moderation, an allegation that came to light late last year with the release of the "Twitter files" documents.

"Did the FBI pay Twitter money to moderate content moderation?" Paul asked.

"I’m not aware of us paying money to moderate content there or anywhere else," Wray responded.

"What was the $3 million for that the FBI gave that’s been revealed in the 'Twitter files' which has been characterized by those writing the 'Twitter files' as payment for content moderation?" Paul pressed before asking Wray directly if he was "aware of the payment."

"I am not aware of that specific payment but I can tell you that when it comes to payments, going back well over four decades when we are required by federal law, when a company like in this instance a provider goes through expenses to produce information, we are required to reimburse them for those expenses, and so I think a lot of the questions about payments revolve around exactly that."

In other words, it's just a standard payment for "expenses," or something, the usual back and forth between government agencies and private companies. Totally normal, boring stuff.

Advertisement

Related:

CHRISTOPHER WRAY

Paul went on to grill Wray as well as Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on whether or not government agencies are actively engaged in attempting to censor social media content about issues like vaccine and mask efficacy, Hunter Biden's laptop, and other issues which, according to Paul, "have nothing to do with national security," a charge they both denied.

Wray admitted that the nature of meetings with social media "have changed fundamentally" in the wake of a federal court injunction.

"That's sort of an acknowledgement that perhaps you weren't just talking about national security, child pornography, and human trafficking, right?" Paul asked.

Wray denied Paul’s assertion by insisting they changed their behavior "out of an abundance of caution" to be sure and not violate the injunction, which he pointed out has since been stayed by the Supreme Court.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos