Wait, That Cannot Be James Talarico's Latest Voter Outreach Strategy?
Socialists Are Now Calling for the Political Banishment of Graham Platner's Top Aide
Sportscaster Torches WNBA Commissioner for Canceling Interview Over Caitlin Clark Controve...
So, That's Why the Trump Administration Subpoenaed Some NYT Reporters
OPEC’s Grip Slips on Production and Prices
Man Who Accused Hunter Biden of $800M Iran Bribery Scheme Now Owes Him...
No Still Means No
Is AI Leading to a Dumbed-Down and Misled Populace?
The State Department Just Canceled a Baffling Meeting Between a Mamdani-Aide and Iran
This Democrat's Reaction to the Houston ICE Self-Defense Shooting Was Hilariously Dumb
DHS Creates 'Deportation Airline' to Carry-Out 24/7 Deportation Flights
The Narrative Wars
A Filmmaker’s Journey Into Artificial Intelligence
Japan Chooses Reliable Energy Over Climate Nonsense
If All You Have Is a ‘Wet Bulb,’ Everything Looks Like Greenhouse Warming
Tipsheet

6-3 Supreme Court Ruling Backs Trump, Halts Billions in Foreign Spending

6-3 Supreme Court Ruling Backs Trump, Halts Billions in Foreign Spending
AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Trump to freeze about $4 billion worth of foreign aid. 

The nine-page ruling released on Sept. 26 approved a temporary stay of a previous order. 

Advertisement

"BREAKING - TRUMP WINS AT SCOTUS: 6-3, President Trump's pocket recission of $4 billion worth of foreign aid UPHELD. A BRUTAL loss for activist judges nationwide. Article 2 wins. Wasteful foreign aid is slashed."

The order is only temporary, the justices wrote, and should not be read as final.  

“After the District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied stays of that order, the Government filed this application to stay the District Court’s injunction. The application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted."

 "The Government, at this early stage, has made a sufficient showing that the Impoundment Control Act precludes respondents’ suit, brought pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, to enforce the appropriations at issue here. The Government has also made a sufficient showing that mandamus relief Is unavailable to respondents. And, on the record before the Court, the asserted harms to the Executive’s conduct of foreign affairs appear to outweigh the potential harm faced by respondents. This order should not be read as a final determination on the merits. The relief granted by the Court today reflects our preliminary view, consistent with the standards for interim relief.”

Advertisement

 

Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Jackson dissented. 

Congress had approved the $4 billion meant for foreign aid, but Trump's administration rescinded the money. The Trump administration says it is Making America Great Again by focusing on the U.S. instead of sending billions of dollars in aid overseas. 

On September 3, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a preliminary injunction directing the Executive to obligate $10.5 billion of appropriated aid funding set to expire on September 30. Of that $10.5 billion, $4 billion was proposed to be rescinded pursuant to the Impoundment Control Act. 

After the District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied stays of that order, the Government filed this application to stay the District Court’s injunction.

The ruling follows a string of court wins for Trump's administration.

Attorney Mike Davis welcomed the ruling. 

Advertisement


Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement