Utah Law Banning Inappropriate Material In School Libraries Faces Legal Challenge
The Traffic Tickets Looked Routine. The Pattern Behind Them Didn’t.
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Getting Nervous After This Poll
Here's How Republicans Feel About Trump's Greenland Plan
Here's How Much Money CA Is Losing As Hollywood Takes Production to Friendlier...
FBI Serves Subpoenas to Offices of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, AG Keith Ellison,...
After Losing Government Immigration Money, Catholic Bishops Question America’s ‘Moral Role...
Hijab Solidarity? No, Thank You.
Exclusive: Bombshell Footage Claims Judges Can Be Bought With Bribes in Ohio Immigration...
Flashback: Here's What Don Lemon Once Said About the Kidnapping and Torture of...
Trump Dumps ATF Merger Plan
Guess How Much of Every Humanitarian Dollar the US Spends Actually Reaches the...
You Won't Believe These Deleted Posts by Mamdani's Equity Chief
President Trump Trolls Europe With These AI-Generated Images
Keith Ellison Defends Church Storming As 'Free Speech' After ICE Protest Shuts Down...
Tipsheet

6-3 Supreme Court Ruling Backs Trump, Halts Billions in Foreign Spending

AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Trump to freeze about $4 billion worth of foreign aid. 

The nine-page ruling released on Sept. 26 approved a temporary stay of a previous order. 

Advertisement

"BREAKING - TRUMP WINS AT SCOTUS: 6-3, President Trump's pocket recission of $4 billion worth of foreign aid UPHELD. A BRUTAL loss for activist judges nationwide. Article 2 wins. Wasteful foreign aid is slashed."

The order is only temporary, the justices wrote, and should not be read as final.  

“After the District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied stays of that order, the Government filed this application to stay the District Court’s injunction. The application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted."

 "The Government, at this early stage, has made a sufficient showing that the Impoundment Control Act precludes respondents’ suit, brought pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, to enforce the appropriations at issue here. The Government has also made a sufficient showing that mandamus relief Is unavailable to respondents. And, on the record before the Court, the asserted harms to the Executive’s conduct of foreign affairs appear to outweigh the potential harm faced by respondents. This order should not be read as a final determination on the merits. The relief granted by the Court today reflects our preliminary view, consistent with the standards for interim relief.”

Advertisement

 

Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Jackson dissented. 

Congress had approved the $4 billion meant for foreign aid, but Trump's administration rescinded the money. The Trump administration says it is Making America Great Again by focusing on the U.S. instead of sending billions of dollars in aid overseas. 

On September 3, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a preliminary injunction directing the Executive to obligate $10.5 billion of appropriated aid funding set to expire on September 30. Of that $10.5 billion, $4 billion was proposed to be rescinded pursuant to the Impoundment Control Act. 

After the District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied stays of that order, the Government filed this application to stay the District Court’s injunction.

The ruling follows a string of court wins for Trump's administration.

Attorney Mike Davis welcomed the ruling. 

Advertisement


Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement