This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Allows Oklahoma Ruling to Stand, Ultrasounds Before Abortions Create "Undue Burden"

The Supreme Court Tuesday denied re-evaluating an Oklahoma decision which ruled it unconstitutional to require doctors to show women an ultrasound of their baby prior to aborting it. This is the second time this month the Court has turned away the state’s anti-abortion appeals.

Advertisement

Mandating an ultrasound creates an undue burden on the woman, according to the December ruling of the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The Planned Parenthood v. Casey, definition of an unduly burdensome law is one whose “purpose or effect is to place substantial obstacles in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability.”

State Attorney General Scott Pruitt said the law merely ensured that women were “fully informed.” According to the petition:

“actually seeing the ultrasound images has a necessary and critical impact in their decision-making process as to whether to terminate or continue their pregnancy to term. In one 2010 study of women intending to have an abortion, of those viewing an ultrasound 66 percent ultimately chose to carry their pregnancies to term, compared to 43.5 percent of those who did not view an ultrasound."

The rejected Ultrasound Act stipulated that at least one hour before an abortion physicians must 1). perform an ultrasound 2). explain what it depicts 3). show the pregnant woman 4). provide a medical description “which shall include the dimensions of the embryo or fetus, the presence of cardiac activity...the presence of external members and internal organs….”

Advertisement

Related:

OKLAHOMA

A lawyer from the Center for Reproductive Rights claimed the law was extreme and compelled women “to undergo an invasive medical examination and listen to a state-scripted narrative, even if they object. ”

Apparently allowing women to remain ignorant is more constitutional, because after all, “what you don't know can't hurt you,” right? Planned Parenthood claims abortion is a “Positive Coping Mechanism,” which is really just a better way of saying it is a easy-out to a complex issue. It would be insane for a woman to undergo any other surgical procedure without first experiencing a screening and fully understanding what the doctor will be doing. Abortion should not be any different.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement