Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
Trump Won’t Say It Out Loud but His Team Thinks They Know Who...
You'll Never Guess How the Authorities Found and Killed Cartel Leader El Mencho
OpenAI Flagged Canada Mass Shooter for Violent Content, but Didn't Contact the Authorities
Tony Evers Just Sold Wisconsin Out to the World Health Organization
A Tempest in a Locker Room: Taking a Sober Look at Kash Patel’s...
The Press Ignores an Assassination Attempt As the Huffington Post Takes the Gold...
The Atlantic Thinks Republicans Have a 'Nazi Problem'
Proof that Anti-Gun Group Cares About Control, Not Safety
Social Media Erupts After HuffPost Questions National Pride at the Winter Olympics
Here's How the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling Exposes Liberal Justices Desire to Expand...
The Violence in Mexico Vindicates Trump’s Push to Treat Drug Cartels As Terrorists...
Gavin Newsom Doubles Down on His Racist Comments: It's 'Fake F**king Outrage'
The Women's Hockey Team Snubbed Trump's SOTU Invite
Limited Government, Lasting Opportunity
Tipsheet

UK Government Used Gag Order to Conceal Secret Evacuation of 24,000 Afghans Under 'Operation Rubicon'

UK Government Used Gag Order to Conceal Secret Evacuation of 24,000 Afghans Under 'Operation Rubicon'
AP Photo/Gregory Bull

The UK government has reportedly secured a media gagging order to suppress coverage of the discreet arrival of approximately 24,000 Afghan immigrants being flown into the country. This development has raised significant concerns about transparency and national security. Critics argue that the government's actions represent a troubling pattern of overreach and a disregard for the public's right to be informed. Many are alarmed by the lack of open debate or accountability surrounding the large-scale immigration effort.

Advertisement

The British government reportedly set aside €7 billion to covertly bring tens of thousands of Afghan nationals into the country under a secret operation known as Operation Rubicon. The mission was protected by an extraordinary “super injunction” — a rare legal order that not only barred media from reporting on the operation but made any public mention of it a contempt of court offense, punishable by imprisonment. The Afghans were quietly housed on military bases and in hotels, at significant expense to British taxpayers.

On Tuesday, the government confirmed the existence of the flights, stating they were necessary after a massive data leak exposed the identities of Afghans who had worked alongside Western forces. Officials feared the leak had created a “kill list” for the Taliban, who regained control of Afghanistan following the chaotic U.S. withdrawal under the Biden administration. To protect those at risk, the government decided to evacuate all individuals named in the breach.

The breach came to light when a British soldier, assigned to a special forces base in London and responsible for vetting Afghan applications, leaked a highly sensitive spreadsheet. The document contained the names and personal details of around 100,000 Afghan nationals — including individuals who had worked with Western forces during the war, their families, and other asylum seekers. Despite existing protocols aimed at preventing further leaks after a previous, more minor incident, the soldier reportedly sent the file multiple times via email to contacts in Afghanistan.

Advertisement

Related:

AFGHANISTAN

The leak went undetected for over a year until an Afghan applicant, whose request to relocate to the UK had been denied, attempted to blackmail the British government by publishing portions of the spreadsheet online. Fearing that the whole dataset had been compromised, the government acted swiftly, evacuating everyone named in the document to the UK, including the individual who attempted the blackmail.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement