The Left’s War on Truth and How You Can Fight Back
The Greatest Legislative Fight for 2026 Is Upon Us. Who's Ready to Fix...
Here's the Anti-Trump FBI Agent Who Launched the Surveillance Probe of the Entire...
CNN Guest Gets Wrecked Over This Claim About the Minnesota ICE Shooting
Did You See This Epic Trip-Up by The New York Times Regarding Anti-Trump...
Wait, the Portland Police Chief Cried Over This?
So, That's the REAL Story Behind Top DOJ Attorneys Leaving Amid the Minneapolis...
The Warmth of Collectivism
After Democrat Smears, Tom Homan Confirmed ICE Agent and Family Were Forced to...
This Is What's at Stake As SCOTUS Mulls the Issue of Men in...
The Left Will Never Give Up Global Warming
Like Two Ships Passing in the Night
No Compromise on the Hyde Amendment
In the End, Tyrannies Always Collapse
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 1
Tipsheet

Stefanik Questions Whether Trump Judge Selection Was Random

Justin Lane/Pool Photo via AP

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) filed a complaint about whether the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s hush money case was chosen randomly. 

Advertisement

Elise penned a letter to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct this week requesting an investigation to determine if the appointment of Judge Juan Merchan violates the Uniform Rules for New York State Trial Courts. 

According to the state’s rules, a judge must be assigned “Pursuant to a method of random selection authorized by the Chief Administrator.” 

Stefanik is accusing Merchan of being chosen “intentionally” to “increase the chance” of convictions against Trump. 

One cannot help but suspect that the ‘random selection’ at work in the assignment of Acting Justice Merchan, a Democrat Party donor, to these cases involving prominent Republicans, is in fact not random at all. If Acting Justice Merchan or any other Justices of the Court are found to have violated these rules, I would hope that the Commission would subject them to the required discipline. And if any non-judicial employees of the Court are involved in such a scheme, I would hope that the Inspector General subject them to the appropriate sanction. If justices were indeed being randomly assigned in the Criminal Term, the probability of two specific criminal cases being assigned to the same justice is quite low, and the probability of three specific criminal cases being assigned to the same justice is infinitesimally small. And yet, we see Acting Justice Merchan on all three cases. 

Advertisement

However, New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA)  spokesperson Al Baker said that it is not uncommon for a judge to be assigned to several cases that relate to another. 

“As we’ve said repeatedly, including in April 2023, Judge Merchan was assigned to supervise the special grand juries that investigated the Trump Organization and Allen Weisselberg as well as Donald Trump,” Baker said. “He was, in turn, assigned the indictments that arose from those investigations, which is common practice since the judge supervising the grand jury investigation already has some familiarity with these often-complex cases and can manage them more efficiently.” 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos