Who Was Cesar Chavez — and Who Will He Become?
Washington Post 'Proves' Republicans Struggle With Bigotry With...Anti-Trump Figure Promot...
Everytown for Gun Safety Celebrates WA's 'Ghost Gun' Bill. Here's What They Get...
Marco Rubio: Trump Taking Decisive Action Against Iran Protects Americans and the World
ICE Agent Saves Choking 1-Year-Old at JFK as Democrats Fearmonger About ICE in...
Don Lemon Gets A Slap in the Face as a Persian Man Rejects...
US Oil and Gas Association Calls Out Sen. Mark Kelly As He Complains...
Steve Witkoff Gives Updates on Iran Peace Talks, and Issues a Stern Warning
Alleged Brooklyn Gang Member Sentenced to 12 Years for $800K COVID Fraud Scheme
DOJ Revokes Citizenship of Two, Targets Third in Immigration Fraud Crackdown
Chinese National Faces Prison, Then Deportation After $95,000 Elder Fraud Conspiracy
Trump to Sign Order Ensuring Immediate Pay for TSA Agents Amid Airport Chaos,...
Armed Massachusetts Man Pleads Guilty to Attempted Assassination of Trump's Cabinet Member...
California Woman Ordered to Repay $14M Over Medicare Scam
Fraud Ring Allegedly Used Fake IDs to Steal Nearly $1M From Public Assistance...
Tipsheet

Stefanik Questions Whether Trump Judge Selection Was Random

Stefanik Questions Whether Trump Judge Selection Was Random
Justin Lane/Pool Photo via AP

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) filed a complaint about whether the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s hush money case was chosen randomly. 

Advertisement

Elise penned a letter to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct this week requesting an investigation to determine if the appointment of Judge Juan Merchan violates the Uniform Rules for New York State Trial Courts. 

According to the state’s rules, a judge must be assigned “Pursuant to a method of random selection authorized by the Chief Administrator.” 

Stefanik is accusing Merchan of being chosen “intentionally” to “increase the chance” of convictions against Trump. 

One cannot help but suspect that the ‘random selection’ at work in the assignment of Acting Justice Merchan, a Democrat Party donor, to these cases involving prominent Republicans, is in fact not random at all. If Acting Justice Merchan or any other Justices of the Court are found to have violated these rules, I would hope that the Commission would subject them to the required discipline. And if any non-judicial employees of the Court are involved in such a scheme, I would hope that the Inspector General subject them to the appropriate sanction. If justices were indeed being randomly assigned in the Criminal Term, the probability of two specific criminal cases being assigned to the same justice is quite low, and the probability of three specific criminal cases being assigned to the same justice is infinitesimally small. And yet, we see Acting Justice Merchan on all three cases. 

Advertisement

However, New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA)  spokesperson Al Baker said that it is not uncommon for a judge to be assigned to several cases that relate to another. 

“As we’ve said repeatedly, including in April 2023, Judge Merchan was assigned to supervise the special grand juries that investigated the Trump Organization and Allen Weisselberg as well as Donald Trump,” Baker said. “He was, in turn, assigned the indictments that arose from those investigations, which is common practice since the judge supervising the grand jury investigation already has some familiarity with these often-complex cases and can manage them more efficiently.” 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement