America at 250 Is Awesome Despite Our Problems
Annoy a Democrat, Celebrate America’s Birthday
The Highway to Hell Bill That’ll Raise Costs for Families
1776 vs. 2026
The Zara Effect
When Will Obama Say, 'What's Happened to My Party?'
Can We Stop the Slide Into Socialism?
The Transportation Bill That Proves Washington Can't Quit Clientelism
America at 250: The History We Rarely Tell
Another Dimwitted Democratic Socialist Defeats a Dumb Democrat
Common Sense Finally Wins in Girls' Sports
Why Congress Needs to Act Now on Legal Immigration Reform
America at 250: The Founding Principles That Still Make America Great
World Cup: U.S. Defeats Bosnia 2-0 to Advance in Electric Fashion
Tim Walz Helps Pardon Laotian Man Convicted of Raping 10-Year-Old
Tipsheet

Corrupt Letitia James Asks Judge to Reject Trump's $175 Million Bond

Corrupt Letitia James Asks Judge to Reject Trump's $175 Million Bond
Maansi Srivastava/The New York Times via AP, Pool

New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office first forced former President Donald Trump to pay a $454 million bond. 

Then when an appeals court ruled that it was an outlandish sum, the bond was lowered to $175 million. 

Advertisement

After scrambling to get the millions of money to pay the radical, politically-driven bond, James is asking the judge in Trump’s civil fraud case to reject it. 

On Friday, state lawyers explained in a 26-page court filing that Trump and his co-defendants — the Trump Organization and its top executives, including his two sons— failed to show there is enough identifiable collateral to back the bond. 

“Based on the foregoing, the People respectfully request that the Court deny Movants’ motion to justify the surety, declare the Bond to be without effect, and order that any replacement bond be posted within seven days, along with such other and further relief the Court deems necessary and appropriate,” James’ office wrote. 

Earlier this month, James raised doubts about the “sufficiency of the $175 million bond Trump put up, which the California-based Knight Specialty Insurance Company lent the former president. 

Lawyers for James’ claimed that Knight is a “small insurer that is not authorized to write business in New York” and had “never before written a surety bond in New York,” until Trump asked for it. 

Advertisement

Related:

TRUMP

The court filing argued that Trump chose a “small insurer that is not authorized to write business in New York and thus not regulated by the state's insurance department,” rather than a large-scale national insurance company licensed in New York. 

“Based on KSIC’s policyholder surplus in its most recent annual financial statement of $138,441,671, the limitation of loss on any one risk that KSIC is permitted to write is $13.8 million,” the lawyers wrote. “The face amount of the bond exceeds this limitation by $161.2 million.”

James threatened to seize Trump’s assets including his Mar-a-Lago estate if he failed to secure the bond funds. At the time, Trump’s attorneys argued that the former president should not be required to post a bond while he appeals the outcome of his recent civil business fraud trial.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement