The Lib Narrative About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Took Another Brutal Hit
Anti-ICE Protesters Try to Shame an Agent — It Backfires Spectacularly
For the Trans Activist Class, It’s All About Them
Ilhan Omar Claims ICE Isn’t Arresting Criminals. Here's Proof That She's Lying.
Check Out President Trump's 'Appropriate and Unambiguous' Response to Heckler
The Prime of Tough-Guy Progressivism
'The Constitution of a Deity' RFK Jr. on President Trump's Diet
Father-in-Law of Renee Good Refuses to Blame ICE, Urges Americans to Turn to...
Iranian State Media Airs a Direct Assassination Threat Against President Trump
US Halts Immigrant Visas From 75 Countries Over Welfare Abuse Concerns
Living Through Iran’s Slaughter: One Iranian Woman Describes the Horror and Hope Under...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Shrugs Off Assaults on ICE Agents: They Are Standing...
Tricia McLaughlin Defends ICE's Visible Presence
Founder of LGBTQ+ Nonprofit Casa Ruby Sentenced in Federal Fraud Case
DC Rapper 'Taliban Glizzy' Sentenced to Over 18 Years for Multi-State Jewelry Heists
Tipsheet

Twitter Files Reveal What Led to Trump's Ban

AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

The third part of Elon Musk’s Twitter Files reveals what led to the ban of former President Trump from the social media platform. 

Advertisement


Last year, Trump was taken off of Twitter following the Capitol protests on January 6. Independent journalist, Matt Taibbi, said that internal company messages show how the social media platform’s standards began to disappear within months leading up to the J6. Even high-ranking executives were violating their policies while interacting with federal agencies.

Twitter executives remained in relationships with the FBI to decide what postings should be targeted for censorship. 

Taibbi pointed out how Twitter’s head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, attempted to describe how he struggled to hide the purpose of weekly meetings with FBI and other government officials that helped the companies decide on policing posts on its platform.

“I’m a big believer in calendar transparency. But I reached a certain point where my meetings became…very interesting…to people and there weren’t meeting names generic enough to cover,” Roth wrote. 

In response, someone who had access to the meeting said “very Boring Business Meeting That Is Definitely Not About Trump :)”

The bombshell findings noted how Twitter executives began to prepare “to ban future presidents and White Houses – perhaps even Joe Biden. The ‘new administration,’ says one exec, ‘will not be suspended by Twitter unless absolutely necessary.’”

An executive suggested that what ultimately led to the ban on Trump was the "context surrounding” Trump and his supporters that have “pursued over the course of this election and frankly last 4+ years must be taken into account.”

Advertisement

Related:

TWITTER

“As the election approached, senior executives — perhaps under pressure from federal agencies, with whom they met more as time progressed — increasingly struggled with rules, and began to speak of ‘vios’ [violations] as pretexts to do what they’d likely have done anyway,” Taibbi said. 

Before Trump’s ban, Twitter began to put warning labels on the former president’s tweets, with a “new ‘L3 deamplification’ tool” that limits users from sharing Trump’s messages.

“Some executives wanted to use the new deamplification tool to silently limit Trump’s reach more right away,” Taibbi said. 

Taibbi said that despite Twitter blaming January 6 for Trump’s ban, the groundwork had been laid well before then.

"In the end, they looked at a broad picture. But that approach can cut both ways," Taibbi wrote. "The bulk of the internal debate leading to Trump’s ban took place in those three January days. However, the intellectual framework was laid in the months preceding the Capitol riots."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos