Platner Is Out
No Wonder Democrats Think Masculinity Is Toxic, Look at the Men They Elevate
The Platner Revisionism Continues; The LA Times Weeps for Taco Stand Owner ICE...
A Minnesota Somali Politician Had the Audacity to Call for More Childcare Funding
Abdul El-Sayed Was Just Busted Lying About His Views on Defunding the Police
Europe Doesn't Believe It Has a Future. That's What Happens When You Stop...
The US Navy Is Now on Patrol in the Middle East
Defending America's Founding Principles in a Divided Age
Maryland Man Gets 15 Years for Plotting to Join ISIS, Attack Jews in...
Massachusetts Man Indicted for Impersonating Army Veteran for Over 30 Years
USDA Slaps 33 LA Retailers With Violations in Massive SNAP Bust
Ex-Union Boss Pleads Guilty to Swiping $290K Over 12 Years
NJ Grocery Store Owner Gets 27 Months for $2.2 Million SNAP Fraud Scheme
United States Begins More Serious Strikes Against Iran
'Informed American Patriotism': Texas Schools Bring Traditional Civics Back to the Classro...
Tipsheet

Twitter Files Reveal What Led to Trump's Ban

Twitter Files Reveal What Led to Trump's Ban
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

The third part of Elon Musk’s Twitter Files reveals what led to the ban of former President Trump from the social media platform. 

Advertisement


Last year, Trump was taken off of Twitter following the Capitol protests on January 6. Independent journalist, Matt Taibbi, said that internal company messages show how the social media platform’s standards began to disappear within months leading up to the J6. Even high-ranking executives were violating their policies while interacting with federal agencies.

Twitter executives remained in relationships with the FBI to decide what postings should be targeted for censorship. 

Taibbi pointed out how Twitter’s head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, attempted to describe how he struggled to hide the purpose of weekly meetings with FBI and other government officials that helped the companies decide on policing posts on its platform.

“I’m a big believer in calendar transparency. But I reached a certain point where my meetings became…very interesting…to people and there weren’t meeting names generic enough to cover,” Roth wrote. 

In response, someone who had access to the meeting said “very Boring Business Meeting That Is Definitely Not About Trump :)”

The bombshell findings noted how Twitter executives began to prepare “to ban future presidents and White Houses – perhaps even Joe Biden. The ‘new administration,’ says one exec, ‘will not be suspended by Twitter unless absolutely necessary.’”

An executive suggested that what ultimately led to the ban on Trump was the "context surrounding” Trump and his supporters that have “pursued over the course of this election and frankly last 4+ years must be taken into account.”

Advertisement

Related:

TWITTER

“As the election approached, senior executives — perhaps under pressure from federal agencies, with whom they met more as time progressed — increasingly struggled with rules, and began to speak of ‘vios’ [violations] as pretexts to do what they’d likely have done anyway,” Taibbi said. 

Before Trump’s ban, Twitter began to put warning labels on the former president’s tweets, with a “new ‘L3 deamplification’ tool” that limits users from sharing Trump’s messages.

“Some executives wanted to use the new deamplification tool to silently limit Trump’s reach more right away,” Taibbi said. 

Taibbi said that despite Twitter blaming January 6 for Trump’s ban, the groundwork had been laid well before then.

"In the end, they looked at a broad picture. But that approach can cut both ways," Taibbi wrote. "The bulk of the internal debate leading to Trump’s ban took place in those three January days. However, the intellectual framework was laid in the months preceding the Capitol riots."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement