A Member of the 2,000-Yard Rushing Club Is Battling a Horrific Illness
What Caused This GOP Rep to Tear Into Jamie Raskin
John Fetterman Had the Best Line to Describe What's Happening to His Party
Oh, So Dr. Fauci's Pardon From Joe Biden Is Not 'Bulletproof'?
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Arguments on a Case That Could Truly Gut...
Your Favorite New Thriller Might Have Been Written by Artificial Intelligence
A New York Woman Was Just Arrested for Attempting to Provide Material Support...
The Suspect Who Killed an Israel Supporter in California Was Just Sentenced, and...
Despite Selling Guns to Undercover ATF Agents, a Venezuelan Gang Member Won't Serve...
Why Is Kamala Harris Reaching Out to Zohran Mamdani?
Michigan Wages War Against Catholic Charities
The Left Just Compared the Amish to Somalis, and It Backfired Spectacularly
U.N. Special Rapporteur on Health Gets Slammed for Views on Gaza, Women, and...
Progressive Educators Have Ushered in a Learning Recession
Manny Rutinel's Radical Vegan Activism Threatens Colorado's Animal Agriculture Industry
Tipsheet

Reuters Sure Had a Curious Way to Describe Israeli Hostages

Reuters Sure Had a Curious Way to Describe Israeli Hostages
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

This article has been updated to make mention of an American hostage who was released on Sunday. 

On Saturday night, the second round of those taken hostage by Hamas on October 7 were released, after a delay in the process. Those released included 13 Israelis and four Thai nationals. Those released have mostly been women and children. A now deleted post from Reuters had quite the noteworthy way of describing such people though.

Advertisement

Although the post no longer appears on the Reuters' X feed, screenshots with timestamps and archived versions mentioning "13 more Israeli soldiers" still exist. It also appears that a Community Notes was pending while the post was still up.

A post from Saturday indicates a "CORRECTION" was made, referring instead to "13 more Israeli hostages."

That current post links to more reporting on the release of hostages, "Hamas releases more Israeli, foreign hostages on second day of Gaza truce." Particularly telling is that Hamas is not referred to as the terrorist group that it is, but rather described as a "Palestinian militant group." The report also cites "Palestinian health authorities" for the death toll in Gaza. NSC Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby has also repeatedly cautioned that any numbers provided by Hamas or "Palestinian officials" cannot be trusted.

Advertisement

Related:

ISRAEL

The Reuters report also acknowledges what either the since-deleted or current post failed to do, that those hostages released "includ[e] children and the elderly."

Reuters isn't the only one that has engaged in an epic fail with how to describe the hostages. As Matt highlighted earlier, Ireland's Leo Varadkar posted that Emily Hand, 9, was among those hostages released. In a post where he's since restricted replies and which has a Community Notes message attached, he described the situation as one where "an innocent child who was lost has now been found and returned."

Other than the problematic narratives from the mainstream media and leftist politicians, a glaring issue is that American hostages have not been among those released. This is despite how President Joe Biden has received credit for being part of the negotiations.

Advertisement

Even The New York Times has highlighted how no Americans hostages were among those released. As a Saturday headline warned, "No U.S. hostages are expected to be released in the next round, an official says."

It was revealed on Sunday afternoon, however, that a 4-year-old American hostage, Abigail Idan, was among hostages released on Sunday. "We continue to press and expect for additional Americans will be released as well," Biden said has part of his remarks on that day. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement