Maine Dem Senate Candidate on Graham Platner: I Agreed With a Lot of...
Did You Hear What This Co-Host of The View Had to Say About...
Justice Department Just Put This City on Notice After It Stopped Christians From...
Thanks for Proving 'Banned Books' Was a Lie, Dua Lipa
Never Forget the Media's Despicable Response to the Butler Assassination Attempt
The Democratic Socialists of America Just Had a Major Vote That Could Impact...
Exclusive: Scientific Experiment Proves Republican Senate Candidate Winning on Working Cla...
'One of the Stranger Nights.' Remember When Scott Jennings Obliterated Touré's Anti-Trump...
The State of Wisconsin Has Strong Open Records Laws, but Government Has a...
What If America's Moral Decline Is an Economic Problem, Not Just a Religious...
Who Actually Works More, the Rich or the Poor? The Data May Surprise...
Rebecca Cooke Sold Herself As an Outsider While Profiting From Democratic Political Consul...
'Disgusting Ideology': Brandon Gill Blasts DEI Policies in Joint Committee Hearing
Reconciliation 3.0 Is Set to Keep Chugging Forward
Sen. Darline Graham Nordone Officially Sworn In
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos