It's Confirmed, We Know What Really Scares the Dems in 2026
NC's Roy Cooper Is Hoping This Lawsuit Gets Quashed
Trump Was Right: NJ Gov. Mikie Sherrill Forced to Eat Crow Over Massive...
Justice Jackson Had to Cut Short an Event in Alaska Last Week. We...
Cities Are Giving Up on Flock Safety Cameras
Female Tennis Players Will No Longer Have to Worry About Men Invading Their...
NBC News Blames Idaho Laws for Death of Trans Teen
James Talarico Laments That Texas Didn't Pass the George Floyd Act
A Democrat Just Admitted President Trump Was Right About the Border
This Is Why I Oppose 'Trans Women' in My Bathroom
The DSA Says You Don't Have a Constitutional Right to Double-Digit Returns
Here's What a $465,000 Government Plumber Reveals About the How the Left Views...
Trump Reveals 'We've Been Nice' to Iran – Leaving Door Open for Heightened...
The Smithsonian National Museum of American History Had a Disastrous Hearing on the...
Philly DA Larry Krasner Accused of Threatening Prosecutors to Bury Conflict of Interest
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos