Did You See What the US Men's Team Did After Beating Bosnia?
Supreme Court Roundup: Another Banner Week for ACLJ
Feds Investigating Why There are Dozens of Adult Daycares in One NYC Neighborhood
James Talarico Keeps Hammering on an Issue Nobody Cares About
More Antifa Terrorists Were Just Sentenced in Texas
Zohran Mamdani Promised Free Buses, but the Best He Can Do Is Millions...
Gavin Newsom's Presidential Platform Will Be Nothing but Attacks on the Rich
Everyone's Favorite German Is Going to Visit the White House
Did a CNN Anchor Really Just Say This About Jewish Democrats?
That Thing with Elections That Never Happens? Yeah, It Happened Again
Marco Rubio Just Terminated the Legal Status of the Communist Behind Hasan Piker's...
America's Next 250 Years Begins With Patriotic Education
Here's Why John Adams Thought Today Is the Real Independence Day
America's Newest Patriots to Receive Unique America 250 Keepsake
Trump Declares New National Holiday. Here's Why It's Fishy.
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement