YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Whitmer Endorses Stevens Over Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Primary
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement