Why E. Jean Carroll Is Now the Subject of a Justice Department Investigation
Here’s the Tweet About Graham Platner That Nukes This Fake Narrative About Trump
Trump's Physical Went Off Without a Hitch, but the Liberal Media Tried to...
Federal Judge Hands Trump Administration Huge Victory on Election Security
Tim Walz's War on ICE Continues
The Democrats Have Pivoted Back to Blaming Social Media for Society's Problems
When Reality Become 'Hate'
Mandela Barnes Touts His Work on the 'Climate Change Task Force,' but There's...
Is Democrat Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet Deliberately Misleading Michigan Voters?
Why Did Wisconsin Democrats Kill the Bipartisan Surplus Deal?
This Michigan Democratic Senate Candidate Made It Very Clear His Party Will Abolish...
This Is How Boston Plans to Celebrate Pride Month
The 'Stop Nick Shirley Act' Advances in CA
No Ebola on American Soil: Trump Opens Emergency Treatment Center in Kenya to...
LOOK: Trump Admin Unveils Latest Improvement to Nation's Capital After Graffiti Mess
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement