Watch This NJ Lawmaker Cut Through Gov. Sherill's Anti-ICE Law Like a Blowtorch...
Dems' Hope for Mayhem With ICE Agents at the Airports Has Blown Up...
Watch What Happens When CNN Learns Trump Is Signing an Order Permitting DHS...
Will This Latest Move By Treasury Trigger Libs? I Think There's a Good...
Here's What Happened to the Oklahoma City Trans Lawyer Who Had a Total...
This NHL Team Did Not Think Their Name Change for Pride Night Through...and...
Trump Was on Fire With These Clips Yesterday
Senate Agrees to Fund Everything but ICE
SHOCK: Christian Girl Subjected to Daily Backpack Searches, Scolded for Sharing Her Faith...
Have the Remains of Famed Musketeer d'Artagnan Been Found?
Vince Vaughn Knows Exactly Why Late-Night Television Is Failing
The Left Would Rather See the Iranian People Lose Than Let President Trump...
Fetterman: Democrats Obsess Over Gas Prices, War Powers but They 'Can’t Even Reopen...
Senate Passes DHS Funding Bill...Without Funding for ICE, Only Partial Funding for CBP
Homeward Bound: From the Exodus to Oz to Operation Roaring Lion
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos