You Won't Be Surprised to Find Out How Biden Handled the Southern Poverty...
Todd Blanche Shocks Democrats by Saying This Person Could Benefit From Weaponization Fund
Tom Tiffany Vows to End Evers' 400-Year Tax Increases and Restore Economic Sanity...
AAG Harmeet Dhillon Announces DOJ Investigation Into Washington's Trans Inmate Policy
President Trump Orders Banks to Look at Citizenship Status
Former Congressman Barney Frank Dead at 86
Mamdani Won't Revoke the Luigi Mangione Fangirls' Press Passes
To 'Let Women Live,' End the United Nations
Roy Cooper’s Soft-on-Crime Agenda Let Illegal Alien Child Predator Walk Free
Hakeem Jeffries Calls on Athletes to Sacrifice Their Careers for the Democrats' Political...
Supporters of the Dignity Act Are Playing the Religious Card, and It's Backfiring...
Guess Why the Cambridge City Council Ended Its Shotspotter Program
Remember the Train Derailment in East Palestine? President Trump Does
The Democrats Held a 'No Bad Ideas' Summit. It Went As Poorly As...
FDA's New Guidance Recognizes What Law Enforcement Already Knows
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement