James Comey Just Got Indicted Again. Here's Why.
This State Will Become the First to Ban Surveillance Pricing
New Poll Shows James Talarico Leading Ken Paxton and John Cornyn – but...
Feds Raid Quality 'Learing' Center Amid Welfare Fraud Scandal
Justice Department Indicts Dr. Fauci's Right-Hand Man. You'll Never Guess Why.
Iconic American Whiskey Brand Jack Daniel's Could Fall Under Foreign Control
The Left's Violence Is Rooted in (D)isinformation
Greg Gutfeld Nailed It With His Comments About the WHCD Shooter
The FCC Plans to Challenge Disney's Licenses for Eight of Its ABC Stations
America250’s Biggest Achievement So Far: Spending Money
Hospitals and Insurers Are Getting Rich Off Medical Fraud
This Democrat Defending Hasan Piker Says His Extremist Rhetoric Reflects Rising American F...
The UN Appoints Iran to Serve As a Vice President at Nuclear Non-Proliferation...
House Hearing Erupts As Lee Zeldin and Dem Lawmaker Trade Blows Over Climate...
Dan Bongino Slams Hakeem Jeffries As the House Minority Leader Rejects Calls for...
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement