We're Living Rent Free in the Canadians' Heads
USA Hockey’s Gold Redeemed the Otherwise Awful Olympics
Tony Evers Just Sold Wisconsin Out to the World Health Organization
A Tempest in a Locker Room: Taking a Sober Look at Kash Patel’s...
The Press Ignores an Assassination Attempt As the Huffington Post Takes the Gold...
Proof that Anti-Gun Group Cares About Control, Not Safety
Goodbye, Chicago Bears
Social Media Erupts After HuffPost Questions National Pride at the Winter Olympics
A Year of Healthcare Reform, Defined by Transparency
If Ever There Was a Moment for DHS and ICE to Be Fully...
The Quiet Monopoly Driving Your Healthcare Bill
The Canadian Cope Surrounding the Team USA Win Is Hilarious
Pressure Is Mounting Against Tony Gonzales. Will He Suspend His Campaign?
Mexican Special Forces Kill Mastermind Behind Cartel Terrorism Outbreak
The Women's Hockey Team Snubbed Trump's SOTU Invite
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement