Democrat Prosecutor Caught on Tape in FBI Hotel Bribery Sting Resigns After Guilty...
This State's Lawmakers Just Decided It's Fine for Pedophiles to Hold Public Office
German World Cup Fan Freddy Leaves X, and Here's the Sad Reason Why
The Boston Globe Pearl-Clutches Over Haitian Workers, but There's Just One Problem
This Ohio Prayer Permit Case Is Heading to SCOTUS
Newsom Brags About Signing Legislation to Rob Victims of Government Weaponization
Here's an Update on California's Unconstitutional 'Stop Nick Shirley Act'
Attorney General Todd Blanche Announces the Arrest of Eight Tren de Aragua Gang...
U.K. Grooming Gang Leader Will Walk Free and Will Not Be Deported
WNBA Star Alyssa Thomas Plays the Victim Card After Caitlin Clark Throat Punch
California AG Tells DOJ State Would Rather Get Sued than Back Down on...
Vice President JD Vance Says There's a Silver Lining to the Birthright Citizenship...
The Man Who Drafted the 14th Amendment Never Meant It to Apply to...
Trump Admin Will Not Renew USMCA Amid Trade Disagreements
No Credible Threats Against America250 Celebrations, Patel Confirms
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos