Jill Biden Has Become the Political Long COVID for the Dems
A Cornerstone of Graham Platner's Campaign Just Got Blown Up
Well, This Graham Platner Tweet Is Something a Nazi Would Say
Is the San Francisco Chronicle Serious About This Piece About Gay Rights and...
So, That's Why Jill Biden's Book Is Coming Out Now
The Underreported Side of the Graham Platner Fiasco in Maine
Here's Why Google Is Gonna Release Millions of Mosquitoes in These Communities
Bill Maher Throws His Support Behind Spencer Pratt
Paul Krugman Calls for a Purging of the United States, and Guess Who...
As Mamdani Demonizes NYC Landlords, Here's a Taste of the Nonsense Landlords Deal...
Scott Pelley Had a Meltdown Over Bari Weiss and Nick Bilton Running CBS
One Migrant Learned the Trump Administration Is Serious About Ending Fraudulent Asylum Cla...
Here's Who Trump Picked As Tulsi Gabbard's Acting Successor
The Country That Needs Talent Is Importing Welfare Dependency and Exporting Its Best
Trump’s Nationwide Shabbat and the Choices Facing American Jews
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement