Roy Cooper Could Be Getting a New Nickname...and It's Not Good
Rutgers Pulls Commencement Speaker Over Anti-Israel Posts
The Press Now Sees Problems With Kash Patel Gifting Bourbon; Voting In a...
Tele-ICUs Are a Real Healthcare Crisis
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers Shows How He Really Feels About Conservatives
Were Wisconsin Poll Workers Fired for Doing Their Jobs?
California May Be a Deep Blue State, But Its Republicans Are Becoming Forces...
Katie Porter Doubles Down on Providing Taxpayer Funded Healthcare for Illegal Aliens
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Vows to Complete the Border Wall by 2027
Illegal Alien Pleads Guilty to Laundering Cash Stolen from Elderly Americans in Grandparen...
Federal Court Sentences Michigan Man to 20 Years for ISIS Support, Bomb Possession
Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's 10 Percent Global Tariffs
Detroit Man Pleads Guilty to $16M Student Aid Heist Using 1,200+ Fake Students...
U.S. Launches 'Self-Defense' Strikes on Iran
Congressman's Aide Allegedly Collected $31K in Pandemic Unemployment — While Working for C...
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement