House Dems Thought This Tweet Was a Banger. It Backfired Epically.
The Plaintiffs in the Louisiana Map Case Are Probably Not Happy With the...
Has James Talarico Cringed Himself Into a Corner?
This Federal Judge Just Blocked Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Obama Judge Busted for Having Loud Sex With Police Commander in Her Chambers
What Happened to 'I'm Speaking,' Democrats?
James Talarico Respects Women So Much He's Come Up With a New Woke...
Seattle Just Acquitted Another Violent Criminal Due to Mental Health Issues
Two of Media's Biggest Propagandists Are Worried CBS and CNN Might Actually Commit...
James Talarico Once Gave an Interesting Invocation Before a Texas Legislative Session
Jill Biden Was Reportedly Furious With Kamala Harris As the VP Pushed Biden...
Here's Which Politician Spencer Pratt Looks Up To
Here's the Big Lesson Government Should Take From Private Enterprise
The White House Just Unveiled Aliens.gov and It’s Not About Extraterrestrials
Zohran Mamdani Doubles Down on His Decision to Skip Israel Day Parade in...
Tipsheet

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments

Tuberville Demands Answers From HHS Secretary Over Restriction of Antibody Treatments
AP Photo/Butch Dill

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra recently took control of the distribution of life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments for coronavirus. The department now has the authority to regulate the distribution and usage of the treatment in all 50 states and restrict states that are using what the government determines as more than the “fair share.” 

Advertisement

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) argues that the rule singles out Republican-led states, and pushed for an explanation on the decision in a letter to Becerra.

“HHS will now mandate providers appeal to their state health departments for mAb orders. State health departments must then look to HHS to tell them exactly how many doses they are permitted to receive that particular week, dependent on a formula that HHS has yet to explain in specific detail. In the days since this change was reported, my office has been inundated with pleas for help from providers whose mAb orders were not fulfilled. This announced change in policy is already affecting lives – patients are being turned away who otherwise could be treated with mAb drugs. It is imperative that HHS explain why these changes come at such a critical time and why states that most need these treatments the most are being targeted,” Tuberville wrote. “It is my understanding that seven states (Alabama, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, and Louisiana – notably, majority-Republican states) were told that they would likely have their supply of mAb drugs reduced by the new protocols. While I certainly understand that these states may have lower vaccination and higher hospitalization rates than others, it stands to reason that they would benefit more from a steady and direct supply of mAb treatments to keep hospitalization rates down.”

Advertisement

 He went on to ask about specific metrics that led to the department’s decision, which the rule does not specify.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement