Pro-Hamas Agitators Assault Cops, Crash NYC Christmas Celebration
A Familiar Symbol Was Spotted at Rockefeller Center Which Was Invaded by Pro-Terrorist...
President of Media Watchdog Reportedly Swatted Over 'Doxxing' Truck That Exposed Pro-Hamas...
As Israel and Hamas Agree to Extend Ceasefire, We Have Reports of a...
Enjoy Watching the Race Game Collapse
Will McCarthy Leave Congress Early? Here's What He Had to Say About It...
Dozens of Seniors in NYC Were Kicked Out of Nursing Make Way...
Rewarding Bad Behavior
Why We Uphold Conservative Values
George Santos May Be Forced Out of Congress Soon, but He's Looking to...
Education Department to Investigate Ivy League School Over Reports of Antisemitism
Chuck Schumer Admits Who's to Blame for the Rise of Antisemitism in the...
Eliminate Federal Intrusion in Education to Reduce Budget Deficit
EV Buses—Investors and Taxpayers Beware
Warren Buffett’s Partner Charlie Munger Died at Almost 100 – Here’s What You...

GOP Attorneys General Rip HR 1 as 'Unconstitutional'

AP Photo/Darron Cummings

House Democrats passed HR 1 on Wednesday night with no Republican support. The legislation is claimed to support election integrity but is filled with radical line-items to overhaul the electoral system, including prohibiting voter identification laws, mandating taxpayer funding of political campaigns, and weakening voting security. Speaker Pelosi and her caucus deemed the legislation the “For the People” Act, while Republicans point out that HR 1 benefits politicians overwhelmingly.


A group of Republican Attorneys General, led by Indiana AG Todd Rokita, took note of HR 1’s flaws. The group wrote to congressional leadership in both parties, arguing that HR 1 is unconstitutional.

“As introduced, the Act betrays several Constitutional deficiencies and alarming mandates that, if passed, would federalize state elections and impose burdensome costs and regulations on state and local officials. Under both the Elections Clause of Article I of the Constitution and the Electors Clause of Article II, States have principal—and with presidential elections, exclusive— responsibility to safeguard the manner of holding elections," the Republican AGs write. "The Act would invert that constitutional structure, commandeer state resources, confuse and muddle election procedures, and erode faith in our elections and systems of governance.”

The attorneys add that the effort to undermine voter identification laws, which are overwhelmingly popular, via HR 1 only puts the sanctity of elections in greater jeopardy.

“...the Act would dismantle meaningful voter ID laws by allowing a statement, as a substitute for prior-issued, document-backed identification, to ‘attest[] to the individual’s identity and . . . that the individual is eligible to vote in the election.’ This does little to ensure that voters are who they say they are. Worse, it vitiates the capacity of voter ID requirements to protect against improper interference with voting rights,” they continued. “Robust voter ID laws, however, require all voters to present photo identification, i.e., objective, on-the-spot confirmation of the right to vote that immediately refutes bad-faith challenges based on vaguely articulated suspicions. Fair election laws treat all voters equally. By that standard, the Act is not a fair election law.”


The legislation would need the support of 10 Republican Senators in order to land on President Biden’s desk and overcome a filibuster.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos