Roy Cooper Could Be Getting a New Nickname...and It's Not Good
We Have More Info on the Cruise Ship Riddled With Hantavirus. It's Not...
Rutgers Pulls Commencement Speaker Over Anti-Israel Posts
The Press Now Sees Problems With Kash Patel Gifting Bourbon; Voting In a...
Tele-ICUs Are a Real Healthcare Crisis
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers Shows How He Really Feels About Conservatives
Were Wisconsin Poll Workers Fired for Doing Their Jobs?
California May Be a Deep Blue State, But Its Republicans Are Becoming Forces...
Katie Porter Doubles Down on Providing Taxpayer Funded Healthcare for Illegal Aliens
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Vows to Complete the Border Wall by 2027
Federal Court Sentences Michigan Man to 20 Years for ISIS Support, Bomb Possession
Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's 10 Percent Global Tariffs
Detroit Man Pleads Guilty to $16M Student Aid Heist Using 1,200+ Fake Students...
U.S. Launches 'Self-Defense' Strikes on Iran
Congressman's Aide Allegedly Collected $31K in Pandemic Unemployment — While Working for C...
Tipsheet

Dems Claim Judiciary Republicans Broke Rules in Holding Vote on Judge Barrett... They Didn't.

Dems Claim Judiciary Republicans Broke Rules in Holding Vote on Judge Barrett... They Didn't.
Erin Scott/Pool via AP

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee boycotted the committee’s vote to advance Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination early on Thursday morning. Led by Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Republicans on the committee were able to hold the vote without the minority party members present, per committee and Senate rules.

Advertisement

The committee’s rules allowed Sen. Graham to hold a vote on reporting Judge Barrett’s nomination to the full Senate, as he was able to retain quorum even with Democrats’ boycott of committee business. The rules permit the reporting of nominations as long as a majority of the committee, regardless of party, is physically present. All 12 GOP members showed up to advance Judge Barrett’s nomination out of committee. 

The Senate’s rules, which govern the committee voting process, also validate Sen. Graham holding his committee's vote on Judge Barrett. The rules prohibit a point of order from being raised on the Senate floor regarding committee occurrences, as long as a majority of committee members were physically present and a majority voted “yes” on the action at hand, both of which occurred under Sen. Graham’s leadership on Thursday morning.

“The vote of any committee to report a measure or matter shall require the concurrence of a majority of the members of the committee who are present,” Senate Standing Rule XXVI.7(a)(3) reads. “Action by any committee in reporting any measure or matter in accordance with the requirements of this subparagraph shall constitute the ratification by the committee of all action theretofore taken by the committee with respect to that measure or matter, including votes taken upon the measure or matter or any amendment thereto, and no point of order shall lie with respect to that measure or matter on the ground that such previous action with respect thereto by such committee was not taken in compliance with such requirements.”

Advertisement

Senate Democrats held a press conference after they staged a boycott of the committee’s vote. They claimed that Republicans violated rules, procedure, and precedent, calling the markup “illegitimate,” but their claims are not based in fact or validated by Senate rules. 

The committee’s Democratic members’ boycott of the vote to put Judge Barrett on the Senate floor only made advancing her nomination easier. Despite opposition from the Senate’s minority party, Judge Barrett will receive a vote on the Senate floor on Monday afternoon.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement