Democrats Say 'Heil Platner!'
Democrat Policies Ruin Everything
CNN Lied About Our Client—Now It’s Before the U.S. Supreme Court
Fantasies and the Rest of Us
The Race-Obsessed Left Complains When the Supreme Court Issues a Colorblind Ruling
Dr. Makary's FDA Is a Liability for the Pro-Life Cause and the President
Our Savings Matter, but This Bipartisan Push Misses the Mark
Some Observations at This Point in the Election Cycle
Iraq at the Brink: Can Ali al-Zaidi Reclaim the State From Fragmentation?
10 Things to Know About America’s Founding
Ending Gerrymandering
U.S. Secret Service Seized 5 Skimming Devices, Stopped $5.2M in Fraud in Northern...
DOJ Launches Blitz on LA's Open-Air Drug Market, Seizes 40 Pounds of Fentanyl
'The Constitution Is Not a Suggestion': DOJ Takes Aim at Denver's Assault Rifle...
DOJ Probes Virginia Prosecutor Who Allegedly Let Illegal Alien Walk Before Deadly Stabbing
Tipsheet

Leader McConnell to Mainstream Media: Leave Judge Barrett's Children Alone

Leader McConnell to Mainstream Media: Leave Judge Barrett's Children Alone
Brendan Smialowsi/Pool via AP

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called out the New York Times for its slanderous piece on Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s family ahead of her confirmation to the Supreme Court. NYT went after Judge Barrett and her husband’s two adopted children, piling onto the public spectacle already made of the minor children.

Advertisement

Leader McConnell called on NYT to leave Judge Barrett’s children out of the narrative around her confirmation. 

“The political left and the press should leave Judge Barrett’s children alone. The nominee introducing her family in a few sentences of prepared remarks does not give the New York Times license to start treating minor children like objects of public curiosity,” he wrote in a statement.

He pointed out that that nonpartisan adoption agencies have asked that adopted children be left out of confirmation battles:

“This is a strange pattern for the New York Times. In 2005, another Supreme Court nominee from another Republican president also had adopted children. The Times tried to make an issue of them too. Nonpartisan adoption advocates had to publicly shame the newspaper before they publicly walked away from the story. One such group restated two weeks ago that this entire ‘thread of conversation’ should be ‘off the table.’ Too bad the Times ignored them...If Judge Barrett happened to be a liberal icon, the press would be running interference against personal attacks and hounding Republicans to denounce them, not pretending they represent some chin-stroking national conversation.”

Advertisement

Judge Barrett is set to be voted on by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement