Something Serious Is Happening in Venezuela Right Now
CBS Unveils a ‘New’ Evening News After Losing America’s Trust
Seattle's New Mayor Joins the Left's Push to Classify Somali Fraud Investigations As...
‘Seize the Streets’: Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi Issues Bold Call as Iran...
How to Destroy a Country
Unabashedly Enthusiastic About America
Netflix-Warner Bros. Deal Is Free Market David Slaying Hollywood’s Outdated, Greedy Goliat...
Socialism in the City
Neither Shah Nor Supreme Leader: Can Iran's Theocracy Survive a Nation in Revolt?
Iran’s Fourth Uprising in Seven Years Shows a Resistance That Won’t Be Silenced
Winning the AI Race Requires Actually Competing
Federal Judge Orders Prison Sentences in Celebrity Romance Scam
Walz Unveils Paid Leave Program Amid Fallout From Massive Minnesota Fraud Scandals
This Fast Food Chain Is Launching a New Product to Celebrate America's 250th...
Why Paying Off Debt Matters More Than Ever in 2026
Tipsheet

Leader McConnell to Mainstream Media: Leave Judge Barrett's Children Alone

Brendan Smialowsi/Pool via AP

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called out the New York Times for its slanderous piece on Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s family ahead of her confirmation to the Supreme Court. NYT went after Judge Barrett and her husband’s two adopted children, piling onto the public spectacle already made of the minor children.

Advertisement

Leader McConnell called on NYT to leave Judge Barrett’s children out of the narrative around her confirmation. 

“The political left and the press should leave Judge Barrett’s children alone. The nominee introducing her family in a few sentences of prepared remarks does not give the New York Times license to start treating minor children like objects of public curiosity,” he wrote in a statement.

He pointed out that that nonpartisan adoption agencies have asked that adopted children be left out of confirmation battles:

“This is a strange pattern for the New York Times. In 2005, another Supreme Court nominee from another Republican president also had adopted children. The Times tried to make an issue of them too. Nonpartisan adoption advocates had to publicly shame the newspaper before they publicly walked away from the story. One such group restated two weeks ago that this entire ‘thread of conversation’ should be ‘off the table.’ Too bad the Times ignored them...If Judge Barrett happened to be a liberal icon, the press would be running interference against personal attacks and hounding Republicans to denounce them, not pretending they represent some chin-stroking national conversation.”

Advertisement

Judge Barrett is set to be voted on by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement