So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
Why the Hell Should We Care If Democrats Don’t?
Israel Misunderstood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 303: The Best of St. Paul
Greenland and the Return of Great-Power Politics
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

NC Senate Dem Candidate Refuses to Answer Question on Biden SCOTUS List

AP Photo/Gerry Broome

During the second general election debate in North Carolina’s highly-contested Senate race, between incumbent GOP Sen. Thom Tillis and Democrat Cal Cunningham, Senator Chuck Schumer’s hand-picked candidate punted on a straightforward question on the Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

When asked if former Vice President Joe Biden should release his list of candidates to be nominated to the high court, Cunningham refused to give a definitive answer.

Cunningham unintentionally made a great argument for filling the seat vacated by the late Justice Ginsburg, pointing out that “elections have consequences,” and citing the Senate’s role of giving “advice and consent” on judicial nominees.

Sen. Tillis saw right through Cunningham’s avoidance of a simple, relevant question about his party's nominee for president, and attributed the obvious deflection to the inevitable “radical direction” of the high court with Biden selecting justices. 

“Joe Biden does not want to put a list forward,” Tillis said in response. “Why can’t the American people know now, what Joe Biden is thinking with respect to the future of the court? It’s a court that will not defend our second amendment. It’s a court that will take us down a radical left path.”

Advertisement

Related:

NORTH CAROLINA

Cunningham argued that the vacancy should be left untouched until the new Congress is seated, insisting that Biden’s presence on the ballot gives voters the ability to decide, but continued to ignore the fact that Biden has given minimal insight as to who he would nominate to the Supreme Court.

If Cunningham and other Democrats want to argue that voters should decide who nominates the next Supreme Court Justice, Biden should afford voters the same transparency that President Trump has by releasing a list of potential appointees, and Democrats should press their nominee to do so.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement