Majority Rule Built This Republic—The Filibuster Is Unraveling It
You Will Roll Your Eyes When You Find Out Why This Leftist Group...
Duke Law Just Hired an Anti-Gun Lawyer to Run...What?
It's Time to Ban the Abortion Pill
Let’s Listen to Burke, Part Two
Tyler Robinson Smiles and Laughs in First In-Person Court Appearance
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Have Served Nobly
13-Year-Old Arrested at Minnesta School With 1,500 Suspected Fentanyl Pills
ISIS Gunman Kills 2 US Soldiers, 1 US Interpreter in Syria; 3 Others...
North Carolina Worker Pleads Guilty to Stealing $102K in Food Benefits
Queens Doctor Sentenced to 7 Years for $24M Medicare Fraud Scheme
A Pox on the House of Netflix!
Reality Reasserts Itself: The End of Political Climate Make-Believe
Biden-Era EV Mandate Next on Chopping Block
Energy Transition Hits a Dead End
Tipsheet

'You Would Do The Same': Sen. Graham Defends Decision to Proceed on SCOTUS Nominee

Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) penned a letter to his Democrat colleagues on the committee, which will initiate the confirmation process for President Trump’s eventual supreme court nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced that the Republican majority will hold a vote for the nominee. Democrats are accusing Republicans of hypocrisy for proceeding with a confirmation in a general election year, despite the different circumstances regarding unified government.

Advertisement

“When the American people elected a Republican Senate majority in 2014, Americans did so because we committed to checking and balancing the end of President Obama’s lame duck presidency. We did so,” he wrote. “We followed the precedent that the Senate has followed for 140 years: since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee during an election year.”

Graham addressed the “different set of rules” that he says are clear after the blisteringly partisan confirmation hearings for Justice Brett Kavanaugh in the Fall of 2018:

“Lastly, after the treatment of Justice Kavanaugh I now have a different view of the judicial-confirmation process. Compare the treatment of Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh to that of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, and it’s clear that there already is one set of rules for a Republican president and one set of rules for a Democrat president,” Graham continued. “I therefore think that it is important that we proceed expeditiously to process any nomination made by President Trump to fill this vacancy. I am certain if the shoe were on the other foot, you would do the same.”

Advertisement

President Trump said earlier on Monday that he plans to name a pick to replace Justice Ginsburg by the week’s end.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement