More than five decades ago, Title IX became law.
"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance," it reads. As laws go, it's pretty straightforward. Or was, until the Left decided there were 57 genders and that some women have penises.
Then the idea of biological sex, rooted in genetics, became suddenly controversial. Gender was a spectrum now, not an immutable characteristic. That's a problem, of course, because how can rights be granted to characteristics that are not immutable? Justice Alito pointed this out during oral arguments at the end of 2024,
On June 23, 1972, Title IX became law — just 37 words promising that no person would be shut out “on the basis of sex.”
— Moms for Liberty (@Moms4Liberty) June 23, 2026
But this was never really about words on a page. It was about our little girls. Our daughters. Our granddaughters.
Those 37 words gave them the starting line.… pic.twitter.com/0OCbj6n2qt
Democrats have done their best to destroy Title IX and, with it, a significant portion of the rights of women and girls. The Biden administration tried to rewrite Title IX to include trans identity, thus opening up protections for mentally ill men to invade women's sports, scholarships, housing, and other gendered programs, while trying to punish women and girls who object.
That was the latest in a long line of Democrats waging war on women. It began with language, as it always does. The words 'women' and 'mothers' were deemed offensive and replaced with degrading terms, reducing women to our biological functions or our anatomy. My personal favorites are 'egg producers,' which came courtesy of Biden's Assistant Secretary for Health and Human Services Richard Levine, and 'inseminated persons,' a phrase coined by outgoing Wisconsin Democratic Governor Tony Evers. But the language was just the beginning.
It led directly to William 'Lia' Thomas stealing a spot on a college women's swimming team, or A.B. Hernandez beating girls in track and field. Payton McNabb suffered a traumatic brain injury at the hands of a boy on an opposing girls' volleyball team, an injury at least one journalist found hysterical. It gets worse from there. Men have been caught exposing and pleasuring themselves in women's locker rooms, using 'trans friendly' policies to facilitate and defend their abuse. In Virginia, Richard Cox said he was trans as he repeatedly exposed himself to women and girls in locker rooms. And in women's prisons across the country, and even in places like Scotland, female inmates are faced with abuse, harassment, and rape at the hands of 'trans-identifying' males housed in prisons with them. This includes Tremaine Carroll, a fully intact male inmate in California. Despite being 6' 2" and 250 pounds and not taking estrogen or dressing as a woman, Carroll says he's a woman and that's good enough for the state. He was sent to a women's prison, where he raped his female cellmate and impregnated her. He was then given another female inmate, whom he also raped. That woman reported the rape, and Carroll accused her of some offense, for which she was sent to solitary. Carroll was rewarded with a third female inmate. Guess what he did to her, too?
All it took was three victims before California returned Carroll to the men's prison he never should have left. He's being indicted for the rape, but the court has ruled he must be referred to as 'she/her' because of his 'trans identity.' Carroll denies the charges.
Now we have two pending Supreme Court rulings in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. that will decide if Title IX will exist in its current form. Both of those cases deal with whether or not states can legally require students to participate in school and college sports teams based on biological sex.
The sane answer is, of course, yes. Under Title IX, such protections exist and are undeniable. Then again, there was a time when having a penis made one undeniably male, too. We live in a post-truth, post-science society, however. All we can hope is that the Supreme Court gets it right.
And then watch how Democrats react. The so-called 'party of women' will attack the court as being transphobic, bigoted, and backward. Which not only will prove the Supreme Court got it right, but that we need Title IX now probably more than ever.