Tipsheet

Some Surprising Facts About Our 'Right-Wing' Supreme Court

Guy Benson
Guy Benson  |  June 16, 2023 12:01 PM

Many on the Left have sought to delegitimize the United States Supreme Court because it's an institution they don't control.  The way this operates is that if progressives achieve their preferred outcomes, they cast themselves as fierce defenders of American norms and institutions.  When they don't get their preferred outcomes, however, they talk loudly about "reforming" or even "abolishing" the norms and institutions they view as obstructing the "progress" they desire.  It's extraordinarily cynical and unserious, as are the bogus "ethics" concerns and phony "scandals" they've been pushing.  The undermining of SCOTUS hasn't only come from shouting activists; we've seen if from senior elected Democrats, from governors to the highest-ranking Democrat on Capitol Hill.  Reckless threats can have serious consequences.

One of the lines employed is that the Supreme Court has been "captured" or "packed" by the "right wing," which glosses over the fact that the Court's current ideological composition has been brought about by the winning elections and the normal filling of vacancies.  Despite their atrocious, partisan behavior in this realm over the course of decades, the Left has lost fair and square for now. They're struggling to cope with that reality, in the face of high-profile rulings they oppose.  Another line is that the current Court  trashes precedent in pursuit of an ideological agenda.  Setting aside the fact that precisely that sort of activism the Left demands from their ideological allies in the judiciary, in pursuit of outcomes-oriented "justice," the facts tell a different story about the Roberts Court and respect for precedent:

As for this term, thus far, this detail doesn't exactly point to an out of control right-wing Court, running roughshod over a powerless minority:

These statistics will obviously shift as other major decisions are released over the coming weeks.  It's often true that the most controversial cases are announced toward the end of the term.  But the fact that the three leftist justices have been in the majority in at least 95 percent of the decisions rendered up to this point undercuts a frivolous and ideologically-driven critique of the Court -- and it also underscores how much consensus exists at SCOTUS, a reality that's often overlooked because many observers ignore everything but the closely-divided, hot-button cases.  Of course, even unanimous decisions have been clumsily demagogued by irresponsible partisans:

The 'MAGA Supreme Court' includes Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson, apparently. How stupid.  I'll also note that even after months of relentless attacks against SCOTUS last spring and summer, the Court still enjoyed more public trust than the presidency, the Congress, or the media, the institutions doing the attacking.  The most anticipated decisions we are awaiting this term (the Left won a big one on redistricting already) entail religious liberty (two cases, one on workplace accommodations, the other related to LGBT wedding services), Biden's student loan scheme, and race-based affirmative action in college admissions.  On that last case, if and when SCOTUS rules that racial discrimination is unconstitutional, it will be wild yet predictable to see "progressives" melt down over that development.  Especially considering how very far out of the mainstream they are on this front in the public opinion arena, too.  I'll leave you with another example of the Left's Calvinball standards on norms and institutions.  The rule is basically, 'we can do whatever we want, but when the other side does certain things that we also do, it's dangerous:'

Recommended

Remember the Man Accused of Murdering Four University of Idaho Students? Well... Madeline Leesman
Bill Maher: 'This Is What I F***ing Hate About the Left' Madeline Leesman