Our Own Ruling Class Desperately Wants to Lose This War
Scott Jennings Took the CNN Panel to School on Birthright Citizenship and NATO...
Oh My God, Someone Really Went There About the Artemis II Launch...and It's...
The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were G...
Wait, Air Canada's CEO Is Stepping Down Because the Video Statement Wasn't in...
NYPD Snaps 10-Year Losing Streak to FDNY in Charity Hockey Game
Trump Calls for Boycott of 'Dried Up Prune' Bruce Springsteen's New Concert Tour
People Aren't Complying With Canada's Gun Grab. Could It Get Ugly?
Marie Harf Just Told the World How the Left Really Feels About Women's...
Tony Evers, the So-Called 'Education Governor,' Just Made Wisconsin Classrooms More Danger...
'The View' Panel Thinks It's Reckless to Do What in Trump's America?
Debunking the Lone Wolf 'Myth'
Iranian Aggression Demands Return to Abraham Accords Peacemaking
Every Child Has a Mother and Father. Pennsylvania to Pretend Otherwise.
Trump’s Strategic Iranian Oil Balancing Act: Now It's Time to Finish the Job
Tipsheet

White House: Overturning of Ricci Doesn't Matter

White House: Overturning of Ricci Doesn't Matter
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs did his best to spin the Supreme Court's reversal of Sotomayor's ruling in Ricci vs. DeStefano today during his briefing. Gibbs said that the high court's decision that the white firefighters were, in fact, unfairly denied promotions because of their race will not delay Sotomayor's confirmation process. Gibbs said:
Advertisement

There's little political significance to whatever the court decided today in terms of Judge Sotomayor except to render a fairly definitive opinion that she follows judicial precedent and that she doesn't legislate from the bench.
Gibbs went so far as to suggest that today's ruling actually helped Sotomayor, and should halt any concerns that she is an activist judge, saying:
One thing is clear, that the ruling by Judge Sotomayor was based on the precedent of the Second Circuit. ... The Supreme Court clearly had a new interpretation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos