It's About Time Democrats Are Finally Calling Themselves Socialists
CNN Guest Can't Fathom How Dems Thought This Was an Acceptable Answer From...
Graham Platner Just Experienced His Own Political 'Bagration'
Platner's Rape Allegations Rehash a Nasty Rule Dems Follow Regarding These Stories
Democreeps Only Believe Women When It’s Useful to Them
How Mike Rowe's 'Build Freedom' Aims to Restore the Dignity of American Work
Mamdani's Twisted View of America
Chicago’s Violence Interruption Industry Faces Questions After Homicides Tick Up
Culture Still Matters
How My Father Mastered Cooling Our House Without Air Conditioning
The Tyrant’s Funeral Cannot Bury the Truth
We're Officially the World's Most Hated Soccer Team
The U.S. Has Been Eliminated in the World Cup After a Historic Run
How Did This Mistake Already Happen Again?
Sen. John Fetterman Blasts Graham Platner's Backers After Newest Allegation
Tipsheet

Why Greenpeace Might Have Just Imploded

Why Greenpeace Might Have Just Imploded
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Remember the Dakota Access Pipeline protest in 2016-2017? It caused a ruckus and created a mess, thanks to the heaps of trash left behind by global warming activists. Well, there was a lawsuit over the damages, and a jury found that Greenpeace was liable. They got slapped with a $667 million judgment. The group plans to appeal, but if they have to pay the full fine, this organization is history (via NYT):

Advertisement

A North Dakota jury on Wednesday awarded damages totaling more than $660 million to the Texas-based pipeline company Energy Transfer, which had sued Greenpeace over its role in protests nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access Pipeline. 

The verdict was a major blow to the environmental organization. Greenpeace had said that Energy Transfer’s claimed damages, in the range of $300 million, would be enough to put the group out of business in the United States. The jury on Wednesday awarded far more than that. 

Greenpeace said it would appeal. The group has maintained that it played only a minor part in demonstrations led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. It has portrayed the lawsuit as an attempt to stifle oil-industry critics. 

The nine-person jury in the Morton County courthouse in Mandan, N.D., about 45 minutes north of where the protests took place, returned the verdict after roughly two days of deliberations. 

[…] 

The demonstrators gathered on and around the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, arguing that the pipeline cut through sacred land and could endanger the local water supply. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe sued to stop the project, and members of other tribes, environmentalists and celebrities were among the many who flocked to the rural area, including two figures who are now members of Mr. Trump’s cabinet: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard. 

But the protests erupted into acts of vandalism and violence at times, alienating people in the surrounding community in the Bismarck-Mandan area. 

Greenpeace has long argued that the lawsuit was a threat to First Amendment rights, brought by a deep-pocketed plaintiff and carrying dangerous implications for organizations that speak out about a broad range of issues. 

[…] 

The 1,172-mile underground pipeline has been operating since 2017 but is awaiting final permits for a small section where it crosses federal territory underneath Lake Oahe on the Missouri River, near Standing Rock. The tribe is still trying to shut down the pipeline in a different lawsuit. 

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

This judgment breaking the back of Greenpeace is already putting some groups on notice, maybe even deter them from being total hooligans, as legal action could follow. I’m okay with that—eco-terrorism, vandalism, and mayhem aren’t exercises in free speech.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement