CNN's Scott Jennings Showed That This Dem Was Not Ready for Primetime
Did Donald Trump Call Into C-SPAN's Washington Journal? Here's What Happened.
America Is Back: Team USA Sweeps Canada to Take Home Gold in Milan
A Tale of Two Athletes
America Keeps Winning
San Fernando Valley Film Accountant Pleads Guilty to $2 Million Embezzlement Scheme
Gavin Newsom, Bernie Sanders Say They Don't Know How to Get Birth Certificates
Romanian Hacker Pleads Guilty in 2021 Breach of Oregon State Government Office
Chaos Erupts in Mexico After Elimination of Cartel Leader 'El Mencho'
Byron Donalds Blasts Zohran Mamdani Over ‘Impossible’ Free Bus and Grocery Store Plan
TSA PreCheck Still Active During Partial Government Shutdown
Arizona Advances Bill to Rename a Highway After Charlie Kirk. Will the State's...
Secret Service Kill Armed Man Who Broke Into Mar-a-Lago
An Ambitious Bible-Reading Plan
Family As Communion: Familiaris Consortio
Tipsheet

Shouldn't This Incident Have Prevented the Jacksonville Shooter From Buying Guns?

Shouldn't This Incident Have Prevented the Jacksonville Shooter From Buying Guns?
AP Photo/Matt Rourke

As Hurricane Idalia bears down on Florida, the state is also reeling from the racially motivated Jacksonville shooting at a local Dollar General, which left three people dead. The perpetrator, Ryan Christopher Palmeter, 21, committed suicide. Palmeter was an avowed racist, with journal entries detailing his antipathy towards black Americans. He reportedly tried to attack a nearby black college but was chased off the premises by campus police.

Advertisement

The incident has served as a means for the liberal media to attack Gov. Ron DeSantis, who they’re indirectly blaming for this shooting due to his conservative overhaul of the state’s education policy. In liberal circles, being anti-woke caused this senseless tragedy, which is a fallacy. Sheriff T.K. Waters was more responsible in his reaction, noting that this individual's actions were to blame, not the guns. Palmeter bought his firearms legally, but there was something in Reuters’ story that should raise eyebrows [emphasis mine]: 

The white gunman who shot and killed three Black people at a Dollar General store in Jacksonville, Florida on Saturday was a 21-year-old who bought his guns legally and had no criminal history, local law enforcement said on Sunday.

The shooter, Ryan Christopher Palmeter, lived with his parents in a suburb of Jacksonville, Sheriff T.K. Waters told a news conference. He died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. 

Waters has said the shooting was racially motivated. Authorities say the shooter left behind several manifestos for media, his parents and law enforcement detailing his hatred for Black people 

"There was no criminal record, nothing," Waters said, adding the only thing on file was a domestic violence call with his brother. "There were no red flags." 

However, the sheriff said Palmeter in 2017 was briefly held under a state law called the Baker Act, which states a person can be "taken to a receiving facility for involuntary examination" during a mental health crisis. 

Advertisement

Related:

LAW AND ORDER

Shouldn’t that Baker Act exam have shown up on a background check? In the aftermath of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, this was one of the areas where local and state officials were cited for letting an opportunity that could have prevented Nikolas Cruz from purchasing the AR-15 rifle used in the attack slip through the cracks. It’s an involuntary commitment that is asked on a 4473 form with the ATF. Did this incident not show up at all on a background check?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement