Oh, You Knew This View Co-Host Was Going to Go There Regarding Marco...
The Socialist Who Recruited Graham Platner Was Banned from This Dem Rep's Campaign....
The Democrats' Favorite Streamer Is Begging for a Defamation Lawsuit
Joe & Mika Display Platner Denialism; Time Magazine Zeroes in on the Big...
The Usual Suspects Are Attacking Queen Camilla for Meeting With J.K. Rowling
The FCC Chair Casts Doubt on ABC's Claim That 'The View' Is a...
Scott Jennings Says Clean Voter Rolls Are Just Common Sense
Gavin Newsom Got Testy With Reporters Who Asked About His Tax Returns
Two NYC Churches Were Firebombed, and Zohran Mamdani's Hasn't Said a Word
This Is the One Chart Democrats Won’t Want You to See
Six Charged in $20 Million Medicare, Medicare Fraud Scheme Involving NJ Pharmacy
Chinese National Sentenced to 70 Months for $2.2 Million Gift Card Laundering Scheme
Treasury Slaps Sanctions on Iran Supreme Leader's Personal Banker
Platner Officially Calls It Quits – But Exits With a Profane Far-Left Message
Charlotte Auto Theft Ring Leader Sentenced to 8 Years for Stealing Over 100...
Tipsheet

ICYMI: A California Judge Ruled That The Sanctuary State Law Is Unconstitutional

ICYMI: A California Judge Ruled That The Sanctuary State Law Is Unconstitutional

California gave the Trump White a huge middle finger when they decided to become a sanctuary state. The whole state would be a haven for illegal aliens. It showed how far the left have lurched on immigration, and on policy in general, and the where the Democratic base really lies on this issue. It’s sort of hard to argue against the notion that they’re for open borders. Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown signed it into lawin October of 2017, but now a California judge ruled that it’s an unconstitutional law. It dropped this week, but was drowned out with the ongoing Supreme Court fight over Brett Kavanaugh (via ABC7):

Advertisement

An Orange County judge on Thursday ruled that SB54, California's so-called "sanctuary state" law, is unconstitutional.

The Superior Court judge said the law violates the rights of charter cities.

The ruling comes in response to a challenge from Huntington Beach officials. The city opposed the controversial law, arguing it infringes on local governments' authority. The judge agreed, saying cities must be allowed to police themselves.

The law bars some cooperation between local cities and federal officials enforcing immigration laws. Exceptions include cases that involve violent or serious felonies.

Huntington Beach City Attorney Michael Gates called the ruling a victory for the state's 121 charter cities.

How did the state respond? By giving its own charter cities, the finger, saying they will uphold the pro-illegal alien law (via LA Times):

Despite an Orange County judge’s ruling this week that California’s so-called sanctuary protections for immigrants who are in the country illegally are unconstitutional as they apply to charter cities, state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra said Friday that the state would continue to uphold its laws.

“Preserving the safety and constitutional rights of all our people is a statewide imperative which cannot be undermined by contrary local rules,” Becerra said in a statement. “We will continue working to ensure that our values and laws like the California Values Act are upheld throughout our state.”

Jennifer Molina, press secretary for the attorney general’s office, declined to comment on the likelihood of an appeal.

Huntington Beach on Thursday became the first city to successfully challenge the California Values Act, also known as Senate Bill 54, after Orange County Superior Court Judge James Crandall affirmed that the law violates its local control as a charter city — one governed by a charter adopted by local voters.

Advertisement

Related:

CALIFORNIA

We’ll keep you updated. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement