Bucks County Dem Apologizes for Trying to Steal the PA Senate Race
Jon Stewart Rips Into Dems for Their Obnoxious Sugar-Coating of the 2024 Election
Trump's Border Czar Issues a Warning to Dem Politicians Pledging to Shelter Illegal...
Celebrate Diversity (Or Else)!
Homan Says They'll 'Absolutely' Use Land Texas Offered for Deportation Operation
For the First Time in State History, California Voters Say No to Another...
Breaking: ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant
Begich Flips Alaska's Lone House Seat for Republicans
It's Hard to Believe the US Needs Legislation This GOP Senator Just Introduced,...
Here’s How Many FCC Complaints Were Filed After Kamala Harris’ 'SNL' Appearance
By the Numbers: Trump's Extraordinary Gains Among Latinos, From Texas to...California?
John Oliver Defended Transgender Athletes Competing in Women’s Sports. JK Rowling Responde...
Restoring American Strength and Security with Trump’s Cabinet Picks
Linda McMahon to Education May Choke Foreign Influence Operations on Campus
Unburden Us From the Universities
Tipsheet

DOJ Gets Its Marching Orders: A Special Counsel Could Be Looking Into Hillary-Uranium One Controversy

UPDATE: Well, looks like there won’t be a special counsel for the Uranium One investigation. Last night, there were reports that the DOJ was instructed to look to see whether one should be appointed. Attorney General Jeff Sessions backtracked on that point today during his testimony to Congress (via Politico):

Advertisement

Attorney General Jeff Sessions threw cold water Tuesday on Republicans clamoring for the Department of Justice to appoint a special counsel to investigate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) pressed Sessions on why it had taken the Justice Department months to hint, as it did Monday, at the prospect of considering a special counsel to probe years-old matters connected to Clinton.

Jordan said he thought evidence unearthed in the last year about how FBI decided not to charge Clinton over her handling of classified information at the State Department appeared to be enough to warrant a special counsel.

"'Looks like' is not enough basis to appoint a special counsel," Sessions responded.

***

The New York Times had a lengthy story about Uranium One and The Clinton Foundation in April of 2015. the controversy has not gone away. It detailed millions of dollars being sent to the Clinton Foundation from the chairman of a mining company—Uranium One—who was looking to have then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sign off on a business deal with Russian-owned Rosatom to purchase a majority stake in the company back in 2010. During this time, Mr. Telfer, the chairman of the Canadian-based mining company, gave over $2 million to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton, who was seated on the Committee on Foreign Investment that oversees business deals that involve America’s national security priority, approved the sale. The Obama White House also knew that the Russians were bribing their way to taking over the company, which they eventually did in 2013.

Advertisement

Also, a Russian bank that was selling Uranium One stock paid Bill Clinton $500,000. The sale allowed Russia to tap into America’s uranium supply, as they absorbed the mining operations of Uranium One, which had sites in the U.S. Now, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has instructed the Department of Justice to see whether a special counsel is necessary to look into the allegations that the donations were tied to the sale of Uranium One (via NYT):

The Justice Department said Monday that prosecutors were looking into whether a special counsel should be appointed to investigate political rivals President Trump has singled out for scrutiny, including Hillary Clinton.

The department, in a letter sent to the House Judiciary Committee, said the prosecutors would examine allegations that donations to the Clinton Foundation were tied to a 2010 decision by the Obama administration to allow a Russian nuclear agency to buy Uranium One, a company that owned access to uranium in the United States, and other issues.

The letter appeared to be a direct response to Mr. Trump’s statement on Nov. 3, when he said he was disappointed with his beleaguered attorney general, Jeff Sessions, and that longstanding unproven allegations about the Clintons and the Obama administration should be investigated.

Any such investigation would raise questions about the independence of federal investigations under Mr. Trump. Since Watergate, the Justice Department has largely operated independently of political influence on cases related to the president’s opponents.

[…]

On Tuesday, Mr. Sessions is scheduled to testify before the House Judiciary Committee, where he is expected to be questioned sharply by both Republicans and Democrats. The letter was a reply to formal requests from congressional Republicans for a Justice Department inquiry into various Clinton-related issues.

Although Mr. Sessions has recused himself from all matters related to the election, he and the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, will oversee the prosecutors’ decision to appoint the special counsel, the letter said.

Advertisement

For Clintonites, the perception that the witch-hunt continues for the power couple is alive and well. For everyone else, the fact that the Obama administration and the FBI knew about the Russian bribery schedule and did nothing should be reviewed. The Obama White House reportedly didn’t want to rock the boat, given that they were trying to reset things with Russia. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement