Yes, Democrats Are Even Anti-Nice Meals for Our Troops
Huh? Dems Are Going to Try and Hurt Trump Over This?
Are We Shocked the Polling on the Iran Airstrikes Shifts Dramatically When This...
The Latest Update on the Suspected Old Dominion University Terror Attack Is Infuriating
US Officials Warn That Iran Is Opening Up a New Front in the...
Woman Launches GoFundMe to Help Her DoorDash Driver Finally Retire
Gavin Newsom's Early Release Law Just Set Criminal With 300-Year Sentence Free
Secretary Hegseth Provided an Update on Operation Epic Fury. Here's What He Said.
Here's More Proof Mamdani's Wife Has an Antisemitism Problem
Is Buzzfeed About to Go Bust?
CENTCOM Confirms Four Heroes Killed in Refueling Aircraft Crash
The State of American Conservation Is Strong at SCI Convention
Democrats Side With the Mullahs
Trump Is Right: The Save America Act Is Crucial
TrumpRx Is a Step Toward Making the Pharma Market Finally Work for America
Tipsheet

Vox: Obama's $400,000 Wall Street Speaking Gig Will 'Undermine Everything He Believes In'

Vox: Obama's $400,000 Wall Street Speaking Gig Will 'Undermine Everything He Believes In'

Some in the media are freaking out that former President Obama will be giving a speech to Wall Street in September. It makes for a nice payday: $400,000. The Washington Post pleaded with the president to rethink this decision, noting that it would be hypocritical due to Obama’s mostly anti-Wall Street rhetoric during his presidency. Moreover, it would only give Democrats more grief, with yet another party heavyweight cuddling up to Wall Street. They had one presidential campaign sunk partially due to the optics of paid speeches. Does Obama want to go down the same path and exacerbate the divide between the two wings of the party led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and DNC chair Tom Perez?

Advertisement

At Vox, Matt Yglesias warned that the $400,000 speech will “undermine everything he [Obama] believes in.”

In an unpaid speaking appearance earlier this week at the University of Chicago, Obama demonstrated his enduring faith in both the American people and his brand of politics. He explained that the progressive views of younger Americans give him hope and that he wants to make it the primary mission of his post-presidency to break down the barriers that dissuade young people from participating in political life.

It's a fine vision, one that successfully walks the line between post-presidential high-mindedness and partisan politics.

Obama should take seriously the message it sends to those young people if he decides to make a career out of buckraking. He knows that Hillary Clinton isn't popular with the youth cohort the way he is. And he knows that populists on both the left and the right want to make a sweeping ideological critique of all center-left politics, not just a narrow personal one of Clinton. Does Obama want them to win that battle and carry the day with the message that mainstream politics is just a moneymaking hustle?

Of course, it's just one speech. Nothing is irrevocable about one speech. But money doesn't get any easier to turn down with time, any more than rebuking friends and colleagues gets easier. To make his post-presidency a success, Obama should give this money to some good cause and then swear off these gigs entirely.

Advertisement

Related:

OBAMA

Also, in that unpaid appearance in Chicago, Obama did mention the problem about money in politics. I don’t think it’s a huge problem, but to many—it’s one of the sources that polluted our politics. Yet, there’s nothing more entertaining than watching Democratic blood sports, so let’s hope Obama takes the money and runs. At the same time, this isn’t the first time the former president has been accused of hypocrisy. Obama is staunchly opposed to the Citizens United decision, though his team created a huge PAC to help his 2012 re-election prospects. Needless to say, it worked.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement