What Biden Said at the NAACP Dinner Last Night Is Why Aides Want...
There's No Way This Happened to a Former Dem Senator
The Bizarre Home Invasion Saga Involving Paul Pelosi Comes to an End
Schumer's Gaslighting Mess of a Border Bill Is 'Dead on Arrival' in the...
I Can’t Stand These Democrats, Part 1
Fetterman Pushes Back on AOC's Criticism of Him
House Education Committee Releases Update on Its Antisemitism Probe. Harvard Responds.
It's Official: ICC Prosecutor Is Seeking Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Hamas Leader
Trump's Remark During NRA Speech Reignites the Left's Fears That He's a Threat...
Our Islamic Terrorist Supporting President
A ‘Trans’ Athlete Won a Girls’ State Title. Here’s How the Crowd Reacted.
Is It Already Too Late for a Biden Comeback?
‘No Sign of Life’ at Crash Site of Helicopter Carrying Iranian President
Thank You, Alvin Bragg?
Stop Accusing Impressive Candidates of Not Being Qualified
Tipsheet

Viva Hate: The Case <em>for</em> Partisanship

Over at the NYT today, op-ed contributor James Morone pokes holes in "bipartisanship" ...

Roosevelt and Reagan reveal the dirty rotten secret of bipartisanship. It happens only when one side is cowed, beaten or frightened. More competitive elections mean more ardent debates.

And so it should be. Our government is designed that way. In the Federalist Papers, James Madison offered his bold solution to the problem of clashing interests: more clashing interests. “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition,” he declared.

In that way, our partisan debates are no shame. The clash and bluster may not sound pretty, but they are how we choose between great principles.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement