Here's What Happened When an Arab-Israeli Activist Attended a Pro-Hamas Rally in NYC
The Kennedy Family Is Pretty Damn Gross and Still Joe Biden Is Worse
We Were Warned
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 214: What the Bible Says About Passover and...
What Can Be Made Fun of and What Can't
The Anti-Israel Protests at Columbia Just Got Worse
Schumer Getting Rid of Mayorkas Impeachment Could Affect Democrats in November and Beyond
Justin Trudeau Announces 'Halal Mortgages' for Muslims
Democrats Promise to Keep Mike Johnson’s Job Alive After Ukraine Aid Package Passed
Trump Attorney Calls for Judge Overseeing Hush Money Trial to be Dismissed
Media Outlets Purposely Leave Out Key Detail About Would-Be School Shooter
Prepare to Shell Out Massive Amounts of Money for Taxes If Biden Is...
Democrat Makes Bizarre Comment on the Russia-Ukraine Border After Massive Aid Package Pass...
Well Of Course They Hate America
Netflix Movie Boosts Program Helping Disabled Veterans
Tipsheet

<em>Aborting</em> Tom Ridge's "Veep" Chances

From ABC News:

ABC News Jan Simmonds reports: On ABC News' "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," former Pennsylvania Governor and Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge reaffirmed his pro-choice position on abortion, and said he did not think Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would make it a litmus test on whom he would choose to be his running mate.

"I would think John would never make it a litmus test, but when it comes down to a nominee selecting a vice presidential running mate, it's their decision exclusively," said Ridge. "And I would respect that decision one way or another."

When asked whether he thought having a pro-choice candidate at the top of a national ticket would turn off the Republican Party base, Ridge said, "I think, at the end of the day, I think the party would be comfortable with someone Sen. McCain was comfortable with. And that is ultimately his decision."

Advertisement

I am amazed to find that I have (unfortunately) become one of the most outspoken opponents of a possible Tom Ridge "veep" selection. 

As I noted last week on the Live Desk, this should be a non-starter.  McCain isn't just selecting a running mate, he is selecting a potential successor.  There are a few issues that are non-negotiable, and this is one of them.  What is more, turning our back on pro-lifers would be both philosophically incorrect, as well as politically and strategically disadvantageous for the GOP and McCain.

Why the outrage over Ridge now?  A pro-choice Republican like Ridge might be a fine head of Homeland Security, but his selection as John McCain's running mate -- the person who would potentially be a heartbeat away from the presidency --  is a different story.  If nothing else, a Ridge selection would demonstrate McCain is not seriously committed to defending the Right to Life.  And the long-term implications regarding the direction of the GOP is a longer and even more problematic debate to have.

Some leading Evangelicals have been outspokenly opposed to a Romney selection -- yet there has been little public opposition to a Ridge selection.  What gives???

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement