Save Your Sympathy for People Who Deserve It
As Expected, Trump Subjected Nikki Haley to a Beatdown in Michigan
Taxation Without Reason
Haley Heads for Another Loss
Michigan Takes a U-Turn Back to the Rust Belt
What the Democrats Want to Give America
Joy Reid's Tacky TikTok Talk
The State of Black Progress
Migrant Surge Brings Killers and Criminal Gangs
Texas and Florida Say the First Amendment Must Be Sacrificed to Save It
Xi Van Fleet, a Sage for Turning Around a Troubled America
A Continuing Resolution That Might Resolve Something
GOP’s Right to Reject Funding of Perpetual War
Senate Bill Violates First Amendment Before Violating Second Amendment
Biden Wins in Michigan, but What Do All Those 'Uncommitted' Votes Mean?
Tipsheet

It Takes Two When it Used to Take One ...

Earlier, I noted that Michigan Republicans may hesitate to vote for John McCain because being the second state to "ratify" a candidate is a more serious proposition than being the first (
Advertisement
the fact that independents can vote in the MI Primary may render this moot).

My guess is that voters don't consciously think this through, but rather, they intuitively understand the significance of their decision.  This NY Times article (about why Iowa didn't give Obama more momentum) seems to corroborate my suspicion that it takes two wins to create the bandwagon effect:

Contrary to some pre-election analyses, there was no reason to expect that Obama’s Iowa victory would have much effect on New Hampshire voters, according to scientists who study so-called preference cascades. In studies of cascades, people do tend to follow others’ lead against their own preferences — but not until at least two others have made a choice, said Duncan J. Watts, a sociologist at Columbia and senior scientist a Yahoo Research. Mr. Obama needed to take New Hampshire to get the snowball rolling.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement