UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
How Long Can America Go on Like This?
Intrusive Bankers and Government Overreach
Trump’s America First Dealmaking on AI Export Controls
Washington Post Layoffs Mark Long-Awaited Decline of Regime Media
Biology and Common Sense Triumph Over Radical Transgender Ideology
Respect the Badge. Enforce the Law but Fix the System.
In the Super Bowl of Drug Ads, Trump’s FDA Plays the Long Game...
From Open Borders to Ruinous Powderkegs
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
Tipsheet

Why Romney is Giving the Speech

Yesterday, Patrick Ruffini asked why Mitt Romney decided to give the religion speech.  After all, Patrick noted, the Mormon issue had not been "as big an issue as could have been expected earlier in the year." 
Advertisement

First, I think it is not surprising that the Mormon issue has not been perceived as a big issue.  Most of the folks who believe this is a valid issue aren't about to go out and say so publicly. 

For some voters, it may be latent biases.  For others, they are aware that publicly opposing Romney -- because of his religion -- would be viewed as politically incorrect. 

Either way, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Romney's campaign was seeing internal numbers that differed from what everyone was "saying" about whether or not they would vote for a Mormon.

Patrick also wrote:  "Perhaps the Romney campaign knows something we don't? That Mormonism is a bigger deal on the ground than we are given to believe from press reports?"  I think he's right.

Bottom line:  What people say in polite company -- and what they actually do -- are two different things.  Clearly, Mitt Romney's team believes this is something they must do.  

Aside from the empirical evidence, though, there may be another reason the speech is going to happen.  I hate to use this analogy, because I don't want it to appear that I believe Mitt Romney is
Advertisement
guilty of anything, but I would equate Romney's desire to give a speech to a defendant's desire to take the stand in his own trial.  While an attorney may advise his client not to take the stand, a man who believes he is innocent wants to have his say, and then accept his fate. 

My gut instinct is that Mitt Romney will be able to accept losing only if he feels he was able to make his case to the voters.  Losing, without making ones case, would be the worst feeling in the world.

In a related story, over at RedState, Erick posits the theory that the so-called push-polling that occurred over Thanksgiving week was actually Romney's team testing to see how badly this issue hurt him. 

Based on the fact that the speech will come a few weeks after the calls went out, that theory is not an absurd one to make ... 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement