Fox News Contributor Outlines the Things That Must Happen With Trump's Iran Deal....
CNN's Fact-Checker Has Vanished
The NYT's 'Me Too' Reporter Ran Interference for Graham Platner This Week
These Groups Used Taxpayer Funds to Push Leftist Causes – the Trump Administration...
The Beleaguered State of Maine
The Libs Are Already Being Insufferable Over the World Cup
Clinton-Appointed Activist Judge Blocks Ken Paxton's ActBlue Lawsuit to Protect James Tala...
Hillary Clinton Is Back and Lying Again
Treasury Is Right to Examine the National Security Risks of Foreign-Funded Lawsuits
The Algorithm Knows Where, Not Why
Timely Care Is Compassionate Care. Then Why Are Families Still Waiting?
What Is Good Economic Policy?
Waning Prominence of Pride Month Is Cause for Hope
Paid Experts and Junk Science Corrupt America’s Courts
Terror in the Twelfth
Tipsheet

Rudy and Huck? Not So Fast ...

Rudy and Huck?  Not So Fast ...


Yesterday, Mike Huckabee appeared on ABC's This Week.  Though he was essentially invited to take a shot at Rudy Giuliani (regarding allegations that Rudy used state money for travel and security for his then-girlfriend), Huckabee
Advertisement
refused to take the bait:

"I thought it was a cheap-shot at Rudy,"  Huckabee said, in defense of Giuliani.

For this reason, some people today are speculating that Huckabee might already be auditioning for the role of Giuliani Vice President.

This speculation, of course, has caused some consternation among some social conservatives -- who have send me this clip of Huckabee's June 15, 2007 interview with Scott Wilder with KWRD FM in Dallas: 

Scott Wilder: There are an awfull lot of people worried right now that the Republican Party really is is flirting with the possibility of having a nominee that is not pro-life, what would that mean if they did that.

Mike Huckabee: It Means President Hillary Rodham Clinton. It means the Republican Party loses a whole lot of folks including people like me who didn't become pro life because of my politics I became political because of my pro life convictions. That's what worries me when I see some of the people who say I've argued it both ways, I can be for or I can be against. Hey whatever you need. Well I'm not a whatever you need kind of a guy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement