House Passes Bill Banning Noncitizen Voting in D.C. Elections
Here's Why the Chinese Military Surrounded Taiwan on Thursday
Portland Voters Oust Woke, Soros-Backed DA
Are Some Nonprofits Threatening National Security?
Speaker Mike Johnson Turns Against Democrats
Harvard Pro-Hamas Students Meet Their Consequences
University Officials Refuse to Say If Pro-Hamas Students Should Be Expelled for Harassing...
Schumer's Border Bill Redo Attempt Goes Up in Flames
The DOJ and 30 Attorneys General Have Filed a Lawsuit Against Ticketmaster
Jim Banks Tears Into Northwestern Over Pro-Hamas Faculty
Poll: Would Kamala Harris Be Stronger Than Biden Against Trump?
New Privacy Legislation Risks US National Security. Republicans Should Steer Clear.
Is New Hampshire Another State in Play?
'International Organization With No Real Legitimacy': Support for Chip Roy's Bill Sanction...
A Clinic Provided a Washington School District With a ‘Transgender Survey’ for Students
Tipsheet

Bad Spin



As you've probably heard, John Edwards has decided to accept public financing.  While this gives his campaign some much-needed revenue, it also puts him at a disadvantage in terms of how much he can spend later, if his campaign were to catch fire (it's unlikely, but stranger things have happened) ...
Advertisement


What bothers me most is that rather than simply admiting he needs this influx of cash to keep his campaign afloat, Edwards had the audacity to try to"spin" the media into believing he was doing this because it's the right thing to do.  (Yeah, right).

Chris Cillizza of the WaPost's The Fix blog recently interviewed Edwards' advisor Joe Trippi about this very issue.  See, in the past, Trippi has argued that accepting public financing would leave any nominee "flat broke like Mike Dukakis -- getting the living #$#% kicked out of him all summer long."

Today, of course, Trippi is arguing that Edwards is smart to accept public financing ...

As any practitioner will tell you, the best spin is believable.  This is not, and thus, Cillizza responded with this analysis -- which hits the nail on the head:

Our take: Although the Edwards' campaign insists this decision was made voluntarily and not out of necessity, we find that somewhat hard to swallow. Edwards fell badly behind Clinton and Obama during the second fundraising quarter, a trend that seems likely to continue when the numbers for the last three months come out today.

It seems more likely that Edwards recognized he would never be able to compete with Obama and Clinton financially and, given that reality, sought to turn a negative into a positive. Edwards is hoping that his acceptance of public financing plays into voters' sense of him as a different kind of candidate and distinguishes him from Obama (the other "change" candidate in the race) and Clinton.

As much as voters tend to decry the influence of money in politics, however, poll after poll shows that almost no one makes their mind up based on where a candidate's campaign money comes from. And, in an election where Democratic voters seem ready to do almost anything to win back the White House, it's hard to imagine them backing a candidate who will have a hard cap on his spending between February and late August.
Advertisement

Well said ...

Update: 3:08 - Jonathan Martin makes the case that John McCain might want to consider the public financing option ...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement