EXCLUSIVE OFFER: 60% Off VIP Membership. Today Only!
Is Donald Trump Going to Get Convicted? Of Course, He Is.
Oh, So That’s Why Lloyd Austin Is Going Back to Walter Reed
Tired of Waiting for Border Agents, Illegal Aliens Call a Lyft and Become...
Will Chinese Athletes Get Away With Doping at the Paris Olympics?
A New National Poll With Key Data on the Trump Trial Just Dropped
The Message of Motherhood
CNN Reporter Shocked By Massive Trump Rally In Deep-Blue State
Republican Lawmaker's Daughter Killed By Violent Haitian Gangs
A Catholic Monk Came Out As ‘Trans.’ Here's How His Diocese Responded.
'Clowns': Kathy Hochul Denigrates New Yorkers Who Dare to Support Trump
This Axios Headline on the Economy Is Something Else
This State Enacted a Law Allowing Cops to Arrest Illegal Aliens. Here's How...
ICJ Issues Ruling in Case Against Israel
Republican Governor Banned From All Tribal Lands in Her State
Tipsheet

Now Reporters Can "Swiftboat," Too

I've got to give Hugh credit for pointing out something that has escaped other political observers. He is essentially arguing that the YouTube debate allows the MSM to get the benefit of attacking candidates -- without being punished for it.
Advertisement


In essense, this is similar to what political candidates do when the "Swiftboat" (or IAFF) somebody. By finding surrogates who are willing to attack their opponent, these candidates get to keep their hands clean, and stay above the fray. (Of course, they've always been able to do this through quotes -- but now they can embarrass a candidate during a debate and put him on the spot).

I still think Republicans ought to participate in a YouTube debate. But if I were an advisor for one of the frontrunners (who have the most to lose), I'm not sure I'd feel the same way ...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement