Democrats Suffer Another Loss in Obsession Over Alito Recusal
BREAKING: Jury Finds Trump GUILTY in New York 'Trial'
Oh, So That’s How Fauci's Damning Emails Were Buried
Another Big Lie About Israel Just Spread Like Wildfire
Michigan Man With a Suspended License Joins a Court Zoom Call *While* Driving
To Fund Immigrant Services, Denver Slashed Its Police Department and Will Answer 911...
Former Obama Adviser Has One Question After Disastrous De Niro Press Conference
Here's What McDonald's President Had to Say to US Consumers in 'Rare' Open...
Here's What Residents in This Country Think of Pro-Hamas Student Demonstrations
Here's Why This Senate Republican Is Calling for a $55 Billion Defense Investment
'Rather Astonishing': Ted Cruz Calls out Biden's 'Witness Tampering' Ahead of Hunter's Tri...
Nurses in the UK Have Filed a Lawsuit Alleging Sexual Harassment From a...
This Super Liberal City Was Actually Flying Alito's 'Controversial' Flag Until Recently
GOP Governor Approves Legislation Penalizing Adults Who Help Children Get Abortions and Tr...
Timing of Democrats Calling for Minnesota State Senator to Resign Is Suspicious
Tipsheet

Court Backs Free Speech!

Amen!  The court made the right decision:

The Supreme Court loosened restrictions Monday on corporate- and union-funded television ads that air close to elections, weakening a key provision of a landmark campaign finance law.

The court, split 5-4, upheld an appeals court ruling that an anti-abortion group should have been allowed to air ads during the final two months before the 2004 elections. The law unreasonably limits speech and violates the group's First Amendment rights, the court said.

Advertisement

Last summer, I had a first-hand peek at this bad law.  I was working to pass legislation which would allow more exploration for American natural gas.  The bill was coming up for a vote, and we wanted to run an ad to encourage Members to support this legislation.

But, because several of the Members were facing Primary elections, we were not allowed to run ads in their district.  In short, we could not (by law) express our free speech and encourage these undecided Members to vote for this important legislation.  Even more frustrating, several of these Members were not in any danger of losing (their Primary opponents were polling at like 5 percent).  We were still not allowed to get our message out.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement