Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
The War on Warring
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
Tipsheet

A Political "Subway Series"?

When I was in NY last weekend, the Yankees played the Mets, and it was the talk of the town. 

... Which made me wonder about the possibility of a political Subway Series beteween Rudy, Hillary, and Bloomberg.

Advertisement

Today's Politico features an article about why a Bloomberg campaign could matter:

GOP pollster Frank Luntz -- who was director of research for Perot in 1992 -- argues that if Bloomberg runs, he would top Perot's 19 percent.

"Number one, Bloomberg is willing to spend his money, and Ross Perot was not. Bloomberg has a record of governing, and Ross Perot did not," Luntz said. "Also, Perot never liked politics. Bloomberg understands what it's all about and has been through two elections."

I wonder how the ratings would be for an all-NY political debate?

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement