Want to Guess What a Local Philly Outlet Did With Kamala's Trainwreck Interview?
Dem Senator Says the Quiet Part Out Loud When Asked About Kamala's Cheney...
The Left Is Powerless in Stopping the Haitians Eating Pets Story...And It's Amazing...
Kamala Harris Is Much Worse Than Anyone Ever Thought
Doing the Job of CNN's Fact-Checker to Correct Kamala's Long List of Debate...
The Terrorists are Watching
Kamala Harris’ Extreme Weather and Home Insurance Comment at the Debate Was...
Constitution Day Should Be an Occasion for Celebration and a Time For Recommitment
Trump's Legacy of Support: Why Jewish Voters Should Rally Behind Him
A Family of Four Was Gruesomely Murdered By an Illegal Alien Under Biden-Harris...
Watch Harris Boast About Her Neighbors Lawn When Asked About Economic Policy
This Texas Democrat Changed His Tune on the Border Crisis
Trump Had the Perfect Response to People Saying He Was 'Angry' at the...
Kamala Harris' First Solo Interview Was Hard to Watch
Here's California's Latest Incentive for Illegal Immigrants
Tipsheet

Trump Administration Directs Federal Communications Commission to Combat Big Tech

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The Department of Commerce has filed a petition with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in an effort to combat online censorship. The action is in response to President Trump’s May 28 Executive Order in which he directed the agency to clarify regulations related to current federal communications law. 

Advertisement

According to a statement from White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, the petition amends Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act to make clear that social media companies that alter or editorialize users’ speech will not escape civil liability. It also requests that the FCC clarify whether Section 230 provides protection for social media companies’ content moderation decisions, determine the conditions under which social media policies so dictate the flow of information that they are no longer protected, and seek transparency on companies’ moderation practices.

Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross emphasized that the purpose of the petition was not to control social media companies but rather to promote “free and open debate” among Americans, especially as the election approaches.

“It has long been the policy of the United States to foster a robust marketplace of ideas on the Internet and the free flow of information around the world,” Ross said in a press release. “President Trump is committed to protecting the rights of all Americans to express their views and not face unjustified restrictions or selective censorship from a handful of powerful companies.”

Advertisement

The news comes in the midst of Big Tech’s all-out assault on viral videos of doctors contradicting the narrative on hydroxychloroquine and lockdowns. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube have been actively censoring and removing the footage which was originally live-streamed Monday by Breitbart. The video received 14 million views in six hours and was the most-engaged post on Facebook on Monday, garnering nearly 600,000 shares before it was banned. It also caused “Breitbart” and “hydroxychloroquine” to trend on Twitter. The company partially disabled Donald Trump Jr.’s account after he retweeted the video, claiming he was "violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19."

In his original executive order, President Trump said America “must foster and protect diverse viewpoints in today’s digital communications environment” and “seek transparency and accountability from online platforms.” Trump doubled-down on that message in a tweet Wednesday, threatening to “bring fairness to Big Tech” if Congress does not act. 

Advertisement

The president has an ally in Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who introduced a bill last month to empower Americans to sue Big Tech companies that selectively censored political speech and hid content created by their competitors. The bill stated that companies who want to receive Section 230 protections must bind themselves contractually to a “duty of good faith.” 

Whether Hawley's colleagues will step up and join him or leave the dirty work to Trump remains to be seen. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement