What a CNN Host Said About Tim Walz Left Scott Jenning's Truly Aghast
How These ICE Agents Nabbed These Illegals Was Diabolically Hilarious
INSANE: MN State Senator Says Attacks on ICE Agents Only Shows That Locals...
Lawrence O'Donnell's Selective Outrage at Vulgarity, and Abby Phillip Gets Debunked By Abb...
Jacob Frey Cannot Get His Way
There Is No Law in the Jungle—or in American Cities, Either, Thanks to...
How China Sold America the Wind Turbine Scam
Food Wars
It’s Not a Wonderful Day in the Neighborhood: Criminal Monsters of Minneapolis
Israel’s October 7 Wartime Heroes, Both Celebrated and Unsung
The Highs and Lows of Nepalese-Israeli Relations
Industrial-Scale Fraud: How Government Spending Became a Cash Machine for Criminals
The World Prosperity Forum vs. World Economic Forum
Trump’s Fix for Breaking Healthcare’s Black Box
Democrats: All Opposition, No Positions
Tipsheet

Arkansas Supreme Court Denies Bid to Get Radical Abortion Amendment on the Ballot

AP Photo/Rebecca Santana

On Thursday, the Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state's rejection of signature petitions for a radical pro-abortion ballot initiative. 

The proposal will not end up on the 2024 ballot as a result. 

Advertisement

"We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification," the court said in a 4-3 ruling, according to CBS News.

To recap, the Arkansas secretary of state rejected the effort put forward by pro-abortion activists to enshrine the right to kill your unborn baby into state law, which Townhall covered

Pro-abortion activists claimed that they garnered over 101,000 signatures in support of the effort. This was more than the required amount. 

Secretary of State John Thurston said that the group failed to submit a sworn statement both identifying paid canvassers by name and confirming that these canvassers were properly trained on collecting signatures. Due to this, the initiative was disqualified.

“The first part of our review is to ensure that the sponsor has complied with all statutory requirements for submitting a petition,” Thurston wrote. “Because you failed at this first step, it is my duty to reject your submission.”

In addition, Thurston shared that if he had eliminated the signatures that were collected by paid canvassers, it would have dropped the total number of signatures to 87,382, below the mandatory requirement. 

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION

Predictably, activists behind the proposal flipped out and said they would fight the decision. 

“We will fight this ridiculous disqualification attempt with everything we have,” the group said. “We will not back down.”

“As I have long said, changing the Arkansas Constitution involves a rigorous process, as it should, and it requires sponsors to adhere to all applicable laws and rules,” Attorney General Tim Griffin said in a statement. “Failure to follow such a basic requirement is inexcusable: the abortion advocates have no one to blame but themselves.”

Shortly after, the pro-abortion activists sued the state.

“We will fight this ridiculous disqualification attempt with everything we have,” the group said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement