No Way Adam Schiff Used That Phrase to Describe the Narco-Terrorists We're Blowing...
Jasmine Crockett Just Made a Huge Move–How Will It Pan Out?
State Attorney General Pressures City to Cancel Christmas-Themed Drag Show
Ah, So NOW It Is Acceptable to Discuss Biden's Border Crisis, and More...
Rest in Peace, Chronicles of Narnia
Democrats Just Proposed Legislation to Make Plane Tickets More Expensive
Man of the People Mamdani to Move Into Swanky Gracie Mansion
President Trump Announces $12B in Farm Subsidies
Greenpeace Seeks to Undermine US Law in a Dutch Court
New Jersey City Buckles Under After Lawsuit Challenging Illegal Gun Confiscation
Tom Homan Says Trump Administration Has Recovered 62,000 Missing Children Left Untracked U...
Tim Walz's Daughter Melts Down on TikTok After Trump and Others Call Their...
Tom Homan Destroys Dana Bash After She Accuses ICE of Racial Profiling in...
Seattle to Host LGBTQ+ Pride Match For FIFA World Cup Featuring Egypt and...
Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump Admin in Landmark FTC Firing Case
Tipsheet

Federal Appeals Court Allows Law Banning So-Called Transgender 'Care' for Children to Take Effect

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

An Indiana law protecting vulnerable children from so-called “gender-affirming” care will take effect following a ruling from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. 

Advertisement

According to The Hill, the court issued a stay on Tuesday, overturning a decision from June that blocked the law from taking effect. 

The law, S.B. 480, prohibits health care providers from administering puberty blockers, hormone therapy treatments and sex reassignment surgery on children. The bill was signed into law in April 2023. 

Shortly after, the law was challenged before it could go into effect July 1 (via PBS):

The law was slated to go into effect on July 1, 2023. But the month before, U.S. District Court Judge James Patrick Hanlon issued an injunction preventing most of it from taking effect. Hanlon blocked the state from prohibiting minors’ access to hormone therapies and puberty blockers, but allowed the law’s prohibition on gender-affirming surgeries to take effect.

Hanlon’s order also blocked provisions that would prohibit Indiana doctors from communicating with out-of-state doctors about gender-affirming care for their patients younger than 18.

The three-judge appeals court panel was composed of two judges appointed by Republican presidents. The decision was released this week, and an opinion will be released at a later date. 

Predictably, left-wing advocacy groups voiced their disappointment with the decision. 

“This ruling is beyond disappointing and a heartbreaking development for thousands of transgender youth, their doctors, and their families,” the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a statement. The ACLU brought forward the lawsuit on behalf of four “transgender” youths in the state. 

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER

“As we and our clients consider our next steps, we want all the transgender youth of Indiana to know this fight is far from over and we will continue to challenge this law until it is permanently defeated and Indiana is made a safer place to raise every family,” they added.

Many other states have laws on the books protecting children from this harmful “care.” Earlier this year, Louisiana enacted similar laws

According to PBS, the state’s “Republican-dominated” legislature overturned a veto on the legislation by then-outgoing Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards. Reportedly, the state legislature held a one-day veto session, the third time one has been held since 1974. And, it marked the second time lawmakers successfully overrode the governor. Many Democrats sided with Republicans to override the veto.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement