Men Are Going to Strike Back
Wait, That's Why Dems Are Scared About ICE Agents Wearing Body Cams
Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to Billie Eilish's 'Stolen Land' Nonsense
Some Guy Wanted to Test Something at an Anti-ICE Rally. Their Reaction Says...
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
Tipsheet

Pro-Life Victory: South Carolina Supreme Court Rules ‘Heartbeat’ Law Is Constitutional

AP Photo/Rebecca Santana

On Wednesday, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that a state law banning abortions after fetal heartbeat detection is constitutional. 

The court ruled 4-1 in favor of s.474, the “Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, which was signed into law by GOP Gov. Henry McMaster after it passed the state legislature.

Advertisement

In the ruling, Justice John W. Kittredge wrote that the state legislature “has found that the State has a compelling interest in protecting the lives of unborn children.”

“That finding is indisputable and one we must respect,” he added.

In a statement, McMaster celebrated the ruling. 

“With this victory, we protect the lives of countless unborn children and reaffirm South Carolina’s place as one of the most pro-life states in America,” he wrote.

Fox Carolina noted that South Carolina’s legislation is one of the strongest in the country to protect unborn life. Predictably, a lawsuit challenging it was brought forward by Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, another abortion clinic called Greenville Women’s Clinic, and by two doctors. The plaintiffs argued that the law violated the U.S. Constitution’s right to privacy and equal protection.

The lone dissenting justice, Chief Justice Donald W. Beatty, compared it to a 2021 state law banning abortion that the court found unconstitutional. 

“I agree with the majority that, '[a]s judges, our solemn duty is to uphold the rule of law.' Today, however, the majority has abandoned the precedent established just months earlier by this Court and, despite its insistence otherwise, has turned a blind eye to the obvious fact that the 2021 Act and the 2023 Act are the same,” he wrote. 

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION PRO-LIFE

“The result will essentially force an untold number of affected women to give birth without their consent. I am hard-pressed to think of a greater governmental intrusion by a political body,” he added.

In June, Townhall included South Carolina in its write-up of all the states that made pro-life strides since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade. 

“The way Gov. McMaster and pro-life legislators persisted to get a heartbeat protection across the finish line this year is a reflection of their compassion, respect for the people’s will, and adherence to the science. Every year, thousands more irreplaceable South Carolinians will be allowed to live and discover that unique purpose in this world which only they can fulfill,” Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser previously said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement