So, Who Will Replace Marjorie Taylor Greene in Georgia?
So, the White House Just Released Numbers on Trump's Tax Cuts. What They...
Wait, Mamdani Got Cozy With Another Terrorist at a Public Event. The Gracie...
Fani Willis Wants to Fight Trump on Recouping Legal Fees. This Is What the...
New Poll Could Show Who's Leading In the Texas Republican Senate Primary
Tennessee Bill Would Place Foster Children In Detention Even If They Haven't Been...
Tim Walz, the Biggest Fraudster of Them All
Chicago Kids Can't Read, but Their Teachers Can Protest for Iran
Left-Wing Activists Are Training Juries to Sabotage Trump DOJ Cases
Deconstructing the Latest Epstein Mania
Senator Tom Cotton Draws a Line Between True Conservatives and Antisemitic Influencers
Steve Witkoff Reveals Just How Much Weapons-Grade Uranium Iran Had Before Operation Epic...
Trump Is Bringing Historic Changes to the U.S. Energy Sector
What the NYC ISIS Bombers Had In Their Storage Unit Was Insane
GOP Will Bring SAVE Act to the Floor to 'Put Democrats on the...
Tipsheet

Pro-Life Victory: South Carolina Supreme Court Rules ‘Heartbeat’ Law Is Constitutional

Pro-Life Victory: South Carolina Supreme Court Rules ‘Heartbeat’ Law Is Constitutional
AP Photo/Rebecca Santana

On Wednesday, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that a state law banning abortions after fetal heartbeat detection is constitutional. 

The court ruled 4-1 in favor of s.474, the “Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, which was signed into law by GOP Gov. Henry McMaster after it passed the state legislature.

Advertisement

In the ruling, Justice John W. Kittredge wrote that the state legislature “has found that the State has a compelling interest in protecting the lives of unborn children.”

“That finding is indisputable and one we must respect,” he added.

In a statement, McMaster celebrated the ruling. 

“With this victory, we protect the lives of countless unborn children and reaffirm South Carolina’s place as one of the most pro-life states in America,” he wrote.

Fox Carolina noted that South Carolina’s legislation is one of the strongest in the country to protect unborn life. Predictably, a lawsuit challenging it was brought forward by Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, another abortion clinic called Greenville Women’s Clinic, and by two doctors. The plaintiffs argued that the law violated the U.S. Constitution’s right to privacy and equal protection.

The lone dissenting justice, Chief Justice Donald W. Beatty, compared it to a 2021 state law banning abortion that the court found unconstitutional. 

“I agree with the majority that, '[a]s judges, our solemn duty is to uphold the rule of law.' Today, however, the majority has abandoned the precedent established just months earlier by this Court and, despite its insistence otherwise, has turned a blind eye to the obvious fact that the 2021 Act and the 2023 Act are the same,” he wrote. 

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION PRO-LIFE

“The result will essentially force an untold number of affected women to give birth without their consent. I am hard-pressed to think of a greater governmental intrusion by a political body,” he added.

In June, Townhall included South Carolina in its write-up of all the states that made pro-life strides since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade. 

“The way Gov. McMaster and pro-life legislators persisted to get a heartbeat protection across the finish line this year is a reflection of their compassion, respect for the people’s will, and adherence to the science. Every year, thousands more irreplaceable South Carolinians will be allowed to live and discover that unique purpose in this world which only they can fulfill,” Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser previously said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement