Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN Host, Panelists Trying to Desperately Explain Away Biden's...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

Pro-Life Victory: South Carolina Supreme Court Rules ‘Heartbeat’ Law Is Constitutional

AP Photo/Rebecca Santana

On Wednesday, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that a state law banning abortions after fetal heartbeat detection is constitutional. 

The court ruled 4-1 in favor of s.474, the “Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, which was signed into law by GOP Gov. Henry McMaster after it passed the state legislature.

Advertisement

In the ruling, Justice John W. Kittredge wrote that the state legislature “has found that the State has a compelling interest in protecting the lives of unborn children.”

“That finding is indisputable and one we must respect,” he added.

In a statement, McMaster celebrated the ruling. 

“With this victory, we protect the lives of countless unborn children and reaffirm South Carolina’s place as one of the most pro-life states in America,” he wrote.

Fox Carolina noted that South Carolina’s legislation is one of the strongest in the country to protect unborn life. Predictably, a lawsuit challenging it was brought forward by Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, another abortion clinic called Greenville Women’s Clinic, and by two doctors. The plaintiffs argued that the law violated the U.S. Constitution’s right to privacy and equal protection.

The lone dissenting justice, Chief Justice Donald W. Beatty, compared it to a 2021 state law banning abortion that the court found unconstitutional. 

“I agree with the majority that, '[a]s judges, our solemn duty is to uphold the rule of law.' Today, however, the majority has abandoned the precedent established just months earlier by this Court and, despite its insistence otherwise, has turned a blind eye to the obvious fact that the 2021 Act and the 2023 Act are the same,” he wrote. 

Advertisement

“The result will essentially force an untold number of affected women to give birth without their consent. I am hard-pressed to think of a greater governmental intrusion by a political body,” he added.

In June, Townhall included South Carolina in its write-up of all the states that made pro-life strides since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade. 

“The way Gov. McMaster and pro-life legislators persisted to get a heartbeat protection across the finish line this year is a reflection of their compassion, respect for the people’s will, and adherence to the science. Every year, thousands more irreplaceable South Carolinians will be allowed to live and discover that unique purpose in this world which only they can fulfill,” Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser previously said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement