The GOP’s Midterm Reversal of Fortune
The Reactions the Tina Peters' Clemency Have Been Off the Rails...and This Dem...
UK PM Reportedly Keir Starmer About to Resign, But There's a Catch
This C-Span Caller Said He Regretted Voting for Trump. Here's the Problem
ESPN Host Couldn't Let This Caller Get Away With This Swipe at Conservatives
When Rich Liberals Beg
Israel Has Intercepted Another 'Humanitarian' Flotilla Headed Toward Gaza
Here's Why a Female Police Officer in Norfolk Was Suspended From Her Job
Social Security Is Earned—and Washington Must Protect It
There Are Enemies and Then There Are Enemies
Book Review: Douglas Brunt’s The Lost Empire of Emanuel Nobel
Where Eagles Dare
Louisiana Voters Reject Cassidy and His Costly Healthcare Policies
Bay Area Report on ICE Raids Is Peak Elite Cope
Dear Mr. President, the (College) Kids Are Not Alright
Tipsheet

Biden Administration Agencies Praise ‘Gender-Affirming’ Health Care for Minors

Biden Administration Agencies Praise ‘Gender-Affirming’ Health Care for Minors
AP Photo/Robin Rayne

On Thursday, the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Population Affairs released a document outlining how “gender-affirming care is crucial to overall health and well-being” for children and adolescents. According to the OPA, “gender-affirming care” allows minors to focus on “social transitions” and boosts their confidence while “navigating the healthcare system.” The document was released on March 31, which is “Transgender Day of Visibility.”

Advertisement

In addition, the OPA claimed in the release that “research demonstrates that gender-affirming care improves the mental health and overall well-being of gender diverse children and adolescents. Because gender-affirming care encompasses many facets of healthcare needs and support, it has been shown to increase positive outcomes for transgender and nonbinary children and adolescents.”

In the OPA’s document, it outlined four distinct types of “gender-affirming” care; social affirmation, puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender-affirming surgeries. The first two are listed as “reversible”  Hormone therapy is listed as “partially reversible.” Gender-affirming surgeries are listed as “not reversible,” and noted that it typically occurs in adulthood or “case-by-case in adolescence.”

Also on Thursday, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Child Traumatic Stress Network, another branch of the HHS, released a parallel document called “Gender-Affirming Care Is Trauma-Informed Care.”

While the NCTSN’s document is lengthier and more substantive than the OPA’s, it reiterates the same claims as the OPA.

“Providing gender-affirming care is neither child maltreatment nor malpractice,” the NCTSN document states. "It may include evidence-based interventions such as puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormones." It added that “gender-affirming care should not be used to deny care or separate families working to make the best decisions for the children’s well-being.”

Advertisement

The NCTSN document seemingly alludes to how a Texas judge halted investigations launched by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott into the parents of transgender minors for child abuse, which Townhall covered.

In an interview this month with Townhall, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said “the answer is clear regarding so-called sex-change procedures, puberty blockers, and hormone therapies. When performed on children, these procedures are 'abuse' under Texas law. They’re illegal. And family courts, family-law government agencies, and the like must do their part to stop it."

Another state, Idaho, is also pushing legislation that would prohibit “gender-affirming” operations and hormone treatment for minors. Republican state Rep. Bruce Skaug, who sponsored the bill prohibiting such procedures, said to the Idaho House State Affairs Committee that children should undergo mental health treatment rather than irreversible “gender-affirming” treatment.

“If we do not allow minors to get a tattoo, drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, sign a legal contract, why would we allow them to go through these physical mutilations because of their feelings at the time,” he told Boise State Public Radio. “It’s a bill to get proper treatment and to prevent them from lifelong, permanent decisions that will make them sterile and mutilate their bodies.”

Advertisement

Another Idaho GOP state representative, Rep. Marco Erikson, told local outlet KTVB 7 that children are not “cognitively ready” to make irreversible decisions about their bodies and that “parents don’t always make the perfect decision on behalf of their kids.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement