Yes, Georgia Is Having a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps, but You...
Finally, We Can Turn the Page on Too Late Powell
Why Mississippi's Governor Called Off a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps Today
VICTORY: SC Gov Changes Course and Will Call a Special Session to Enact...
This Democrat Just Raked the New York Times Over the Coals Over Claims...
Press Is Attacking Pratt, Ignoring the Dems Attacking Courts, and Overlooking the IdiAOC...
Here's Another Woke Judge Putting Criminals Ahead of Public Safety
Here's More From Xavier Becerra's Embarrassing Interview With KTLA
Zohran Mamdani Is Bragging About Erasing NYC's Budget Deficit. There's Just One Problem.
JD Vance Announces the White House Fraud Task Force's Latest Move to Stop...
LOL: Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Now Claims He Wanted Biden to Close...
Mike Johnson: Republicans Must Defeat the Mamdanis of the Democratic Party
China: Our Enemy, Not Our Rival
Nearly 700 Fake Claims, $11 Million Stolen: Illinois Woman Found Guilty of COVID-19...
SNAP Crackdown: Mississippi Man Latest in Family Fraud Spree to Plead Guilty
Tipsheet

Here's What TikTok Had to Say After Federal Court Upheld Law Banning App

Here's What TikTok Had to Say After Federal Court Upheld Law Banning App
AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a law requiring TikTok’s parent company to sell the app or face a ban in the United States. 

“The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States. Here the Government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States. For these reasons the petitions are denied,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit wrote in denying TikTok’s petition. 

Advertisement

The law, signed earlier this year by President Biden, requires ByteDance to divest from TikTok by Jan. 19 or face a U.S. ban.

TikTok and ByteDance sued to block the law in May, alongside several content creators, arguing that divestment was practically impossible. As a result, the law effectively bans TikTok nationwide, which they contend is unconstitutional. 

However, the Biden administration has argued that TikTok can be used by the Chinese government to “achieve its overarching objective to undermine American interests.” 

The court sided with the Biden administration, finding that the “significant” impacts of the TikTok ban are justified by the government’s national security concerns.

“Unless TikTok executes a qualified divestiture by January 19, 2025 — or the President grants a 90-day extension based upon progress towards a qualified divestiture — its platform will effectively be unavailable in the United States, at least for a time,” the court wrote in Friday’s opinion.

“Consequently, TikTok’s millions of users will need to find alternative media of communication,” it continued. “That burden is attributable to the PRC’s hybrid commercial threat to U.S. national security, not to the U.S. Government, which engaged with TikTok through a multi-year process in an effort to find an alternative solution.”  (The Hill)

Advertisement

Related:

TIKTOK

The company on Friday said it is appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court. 

"The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans' right to free speech, and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue," the company said. "Unfortunately, the TikTok ban was conceived and pushed through based upon inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information, resulting in outright censorship of the American people. The TikTok ban, unless stopped, will silence the voices of over 170 million Americans here in the US and around the world on January 19th, 2025."

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement