Are We Shocked About This Damning Internal Poll for Kamala?
CBS News Busted for Editing Kamala's 60 Minutes Interview
More Humiliation Revealed Over Kamala's Inability to Secure Firefighters Union Endorsement
Biden Takes a Blowtorch to Obama in New Book
When Kamala Harris' Promises Come to Nothing
Musk Has a Theory for Why Harris Is Getting Support From Certain Billionaires
One Year Later
You Won't Believe How Many American Teens Think They're 'Transgender'
Here's How JD Vance Knew He Did So Well During That VP Debate
The Top 12 'Worst-Offending' Children's Hospitals Mutilating Minors
Trump’s Bounce from Butler and Elon
Do Rocks on Mars Have Rights?
Highway to Hell
Social Media Must Become a Bastion for Free Speech
Tipsheet
Premium

Court Responds to Haitian Group Seeking Criminal Charges Against Trump, Vance Over Pet-Eating Claims

Jacksonville Humane Society via AP

Last month, a Haitian group filed a complaint seeking criminal charges against former President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance over statements the Republicans made concerning the debate over whether Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, are eating locals’ pets. 

“[Haitian Bridge Alliance] filed this criminal charge to hold Trump and Vance accountable for the devastating harm they caused our community in Springfield and has impacted Haitians around the United States,” said HBA co-founder and executive director Guerline Jozef in a statement. 

But the matter hit a roadblock over the weekend when a judicial panel declined to issue arrest warrants for the two. 

[T]he Clark County Municipal Court announced that they found no probable cause to issue arrest warrants or misdemeanor summons as the Haitian group requested.

The court did, however, refer the case to county prosecutors.

"The conclusion of whether the evidence and causation necessary for probable cause exists to commence a prosecution of the alleged offenses is best left in the investigatory hands of the prosecution," the judges wrote in their decision.

The HBA's case requests charges of felony inducing panic, disrupting public services, making false alarms, two counts of complicity, two counts of telecommunications harassment and aggravated menacing.

The judges that reviewed the case said particular consideration should be given to "the strong constitutional protections afforded to speech, and political speech in particular," adding that because of the proximity of the election and the "contentious" nature of the issue of immigration, "the Court cannot automatically presume the good faith nature of the affidavits." (Newsweek)

In a statement to the Associated Press, Trump-Vance campaign communications director Steven Cheung said the Republican presidential nominee was "rightfully highlighting the failed immigration system that [Vice President] Kamala Harris has overseen, bringing thousands of illegal immigrants pouring into communities like Springfield and many others across the country."

 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement