MS NOW Opposes Officers With Cams, CNN’s Sweet Prose for an ICE Agitator,...
Don't Let Cea Weaver's Tears Fool You
Is America Destroying Itself?
Greenland or Bust: The Compelling Case for Acquisition
The Gift of America and the Gift of Life
Banning the Muslim Brotherhood: A Good Start, Part 1
Negotiating With an Aggressor: Why Diplomacy Alone Cannot End Russia’s War
The Cost of Reckless Disclosure
Anti-ICE Agitators Storm Hotels and Overwhelm Police
New York Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Federal Agent and His Children
Texas Couple Convicted of Running $25M COVID-Era Pyramid Scheme That Defrauded 10,000 Vict...
Automakers Eat Billion-Dollar Losses on Electric Vehicles
Texas AG Ken Paxton Shuts Down Taxpayer Funded 'Abortion Tourism'
$500K Stolen, 20 States Targeted: Detroit Man Admits Wire Fraud and Identity Theft
DHS to Surge 1,000 Additional Agents Into Minneapolis As Protests Escalate
Tipsheet
Premium

Court Responds to Haitian Group Seeking Criminal Charges Against Trump, Vance Over Pet-Eating Claims

Jacksonville Humane Society via AP

Last month, a Haitian group filed a complaint seeking criminal charges against former President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance over statements the Republicans made concerning the debate over whether Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, are eating locals’ pets. 

“[Haitian Bridge Alliance] filed this criminal charge to hold Trump and Vance accountable for the devastating harm they caused our community in Springfield and has impacted Haitians around the United States,” said HBA co-founder and executive director Guerline Jozef in a statement. 

But the matter hit a roadblock over the weekend when a judicial panel declined to issue arrest warrants for the two. 

[T]he Clark County Municipal Court announced that they found no probable cause to issue arrest warrants or misdemeanor summons as the Haitian group requested.

The court did, however, refer the case to county prosecutors.

"The conclusion of whether the evidence and causation necessary for probable cause exists to commence a prosecution of the alleged offenses is best left in the investigatory hands of the prosecution," the judges wrote in their decision.

The HBA's case requests charges of felony inducing panic, disrupting public services, making false alarms, two counts of complicity, two counts of telecommunications harassment and aggravated menacing.

The judges that reviewed the case said particular consideration should be given to "the strong constitutional protections afforded to speech, and political speech in particular," adding that because of the proximity of the election and the "contentious" nature of the issue of immigration, "the Court cannot automatically presume the good faith nature of the affidavits." (Newsweek)

In a statement to the Associated Press, Trump-Vance campaign communications director Steven Cheung said the Republican presidential nominee was "rightfully highlighting the failed immigration system that [Vice President] Kamala Harris has overseen, bringing thousands of illegal immigrants pouring into communities like Springfield and many others across the country."

 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement