Nick Shirley and Ron Johnson Blow Lid Off Fraud Pipeline That Sent Cash...
Watch This Democrat Candidate Channel Drunken Cheerleader Energy in Cringeworthy Campaign...
Bystanders Pummel Man Who Tried to Stab Muslim Mall Employee to Death
Elissa Slotkin Repeats This Insulting Lie About Married Women Supporting Democrats
A New Poll Shows Socialism Isn't As Popular As the Left Wants Us...
Speaker Mike Johnson Surpasses a Record $135 Million in Fundraising for 2026 Midterms
Rep. Randy Fine Asked Who Can Get Pregnant, and This Witness Answer Was...
Too 'Hop' to Handle?
Did New York City Really Deny a Burned Down Church a Permit to...
Who Gets to Choose America?
New York Just Became the First State to Pass an AI Data Center...
A Venture Capitalist Just Ended the Case for the CA Billionaire Tax
President Trump Just Overruled DHS on ICE Traffic Stops
Tom Homan Has a Message for Critics of ICE's New Traffic Stop Policy
Adviser to Accused Medicaid Fraudsters Is a Major Donor to Mamdani, Hochul
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement