Wait, Did CNN Really Just Broadcast This Ahead of Trump's Attendance at the...
Wow. A Rare Solid Take From Whoopi Goldberg Regarding Trump Attending Tonight's Knicks...
What This Dem Rep Said About Trump Over the Weekend Is What Cost...
Idris Elba Argues Against 'Woke' James Bond
The Pelley Drama Continues and the Audience Is Beginning to Wane, As CBS...
Karen Bass Just Responded to Nithya Raman's Surge—and It Sounded a Lot Like...
There Is Another Reason We Can't Let Democrats Win the Midterms
The Karmelo Anthony Case Has Countless People Denying Reality
Republican Advances to General Election in California Governor's Race
Former Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino Announces Exploratory Move Ahead of 2028
James Talarico Undergoes Political Reassignment Surgery During His Latest Interview
Trump Officially Taps Acting AG Todd Blanche to Head Justice Department
Defense Rests Case After Shocking Day in Karmelo Anthony Trial
Trump Wants the Senate Parliamentarian Axed. Here's A Look Inside That Debate.
About That 'Bombshell' Endorsement James Talarico Got Today
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement