So That's Why Justice Jackson Had to Leave This Alaska Event Early Last...
Female Tennis Players Will No Longer Have to Worry About Men Invading Their...
Prosecutor Exposed for Having Relationship With Illegal Alien Accused of Sexual Assault
DHS Laid Waste to This Fake New York Times Report
Socialist Candidate Says Those Who Listen to Marjorie Taylor Greene Will Vote for...
A Democrat Just Admitted President Trump Was Right About the Border
This Is Why I Oppose 'Trans Women' in My Bathroom
Here's Why an Illegal Alien Convicted of Murder Is Suing President Trump
If Hollywood Misses USAID So Much, Why Don't They Step Up?
Roy Cooper Promises to Fight Big Insurance, So Why Is He Taking Campaign...
Here's What a $465,000 Government Plumber Reveals About the How the Left Views...
Van Jones Says Establishment Democrats Are Secretly Thanking Him for Calling Out the...
Here's How Bad Economics Created America's Teen Takeover Crisis
Philly DA Larry Krasner Accused of Threatening Prosecutors to Bury Conflict of Interest
Two Blue States Subject to Major Payment Pause As Anti-Fraud Effort Continues
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement