New Fed Report Shows How Joe Biden's Illegal Alien Invasion Brutalized Our Economy
Two Blue Cities Were War Zones Over the Holiday Weekend
This Former Elizabeth Warren Staffer Attended the Ayatollah's Funeral, and Here's What She...
A Democrat Just Vowed to Investigate America's 250th Celebration for Daring to Invoke...
Variety's Latest Story on Rob Reiner Shows How Deeply They're Infected With Trump...
A WI School Teacher's Fourth of July Posts Just Landed Her in Hot...
Patriot Front Returns Just in Time to Undermine America's 250th Celebrations
Democrats Want to Tax Billionaires More, but Never Propose Taxing Working Americans Less
Ketanji Brown Jackson Hits the Front Page of Essence Magazine, and Check Out...
The LGBTQ Movement Just Found Out How Islamic Nations Actually Feel About Them
The Next Great American Frontier
Charlie Kirk's Family Set for First Face-to-Face With Alleged Assassin Tyler Robinson in...
Not So Fast: Belgium Appeals Balogun Decision Ahead of USA Game Tonight
Ted Cruz On the Supreme Court? Trump Reveals Why He Would Think About...
Trump Accounts Launch With Historic Stock Market Move
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement