Eric Swalwell's Sexual Misconduct Fiasco Just Got Worse
Republicans and Democrats Can't Agree on How to Regulate Artificial Intelligence
Treasury Department Sanctions Mexican Anti-Government Activist Over Alleged Ties to Cartel
WaPo Baffled by Lack of Swalwell Press Coverage; Pete Hegseth Did NOT Say...
These Ten House Republicans Just Voted With Democrats to Keep Haitian Migrants in...
Buddy Carter’s Ethics and Conflict of Interest Issues Come to Light in U.S....
Sports Journalists Are Melting Down Over 'Controversial' Statue at the Texas Rangers' Stad...
Speaker Mike Johnson Sets Fundraising Record With $34 Million Haul in the First...
Colorado's Assault on Second Amendment Continues
Think US is Only Place With School Shootings? Think Again
Justice Clarence Thomas Calls on Americans to Take Ownership In Their Civic Engagement
LOL: Chuck Schumer Still Thinks Iran Is Running Circles Around President Trump
Justice Clarence Thomas Reminds Americans Why Progressivism Is Incompatible With Our Found...
The US Oil and Gas Association Just Leveled Kamala Harris
DC Solar Accountant Gets 66 Months for $912 Million Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement