Property Taxes Might Be on the Way Out in This State
Trump Just Blew Up the Media's Narrative on Iran With a Single Post
Fetterman Goes Nuclear On Platner Over Sexually Explicit Messages
Turns Out James Talarico's Church Spends Lots of Money on Woke Causes
Michigan Republican Rep. Bill Huizenga Introduces 'Deport the Terrorists Act'
The Emotional Displacement of Losing a Part of Your Community
Texas Republican Candidate Blasts Democrats Over 'Sham' School Shooting Statistics
Keep Politicians Out of College Sports
Palmer Luckey Reveals Why China Is Outpacing the US in Manufacturing—and Why It’s...
Jerome Powell Is Out as Fed Chair, But He Is Still Taking Swipes...
Mamdani Is Running the Classic Socialist Playbook: Blaming Capitalism for Problems the Gov...
Bernie Sanders Doubles Down on His Support For Graham Platner Despite Disgusting Controver...
EXCLUSIVE: Incentive Proposed to Enable Homeland Security to Vet Voter Rolls
Starmer Lets Sikhs Keep the Knife That Killed Henry Nowak — but Won't...
Teen Who Raised Donations to "Fight White Supremacy" Faces Trial for Murder
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement