Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
Ted Cruz Makes Interesting Prediction About Democrats in 2028
‘You’ve Got Mail’: NYC Mayor Taunts Wealthy Homeowners As He Robs Them Blind...
Cory Mills Lashes Out at Claims That the DOJ Is Investigating Him
Secret Service Agent on JD Vance’s Detail Caught Leaking Travel Plans to Leftist...
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
This Is Who Mamdani Blamed for NYPD Violence
USA Today Stands by Nancy Armour's Ridiculous Caitlin Clark Column
Here's Why the NYPD Union Is Livid With Mamdani Right Now
Gavin Newsom Just Announced He's Going to Waste More Taxpayer Money on Fighting...
James Talarico Jumps on the 'Prison Is Violence' Bandwagon, and That'll Go Over...
Look, If James Carville Says So…
Exclusive: ICE's Latest Arrests Include Serious Criminals As Daily Numbers Remain High
Trump Meeting With Two Major World Leaders on Tuesday
New Tariffs Were Just Enacted. Here's Who They're Hitting.
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement