We Have the Results of Trump's Cognitive Score
Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
Weren't Democrats Opposed to 'Christian Nationalism'?
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
James Talarico's Campaign Website Reveals His Radical Immigration Desires
Stephen Colbert's Failed Comedy Act Was Bleeding CBS Dry
EXCLUSIVE: James Talarico's Influence Helped Secure His Vegan Girlfriend a Tax-Payer Funde...
EXCLUSIVE: Karen Bass Is in 'Serious Jeopardy' of Losing Mayoral Race, Poll Suggests
United Flight Forced to Land After Attempted Hijacking
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Germany's Bureaucracy Crisis: How Red Tape Is Costing the Economy €146 Billion a...
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos