They're Scattering: Anti-ICE Leftists Consider Fleeing Country After Signal Chat Got Expos...
Tim Walz Caves, Will Work With Trump and Tom Homan. Is This...
Here's What Schumer and Company Are Demanding to Avoid Another Government Shutdown
How the Economy Created This Disturbing New Dating Trend
Here's What Republican Lawmakers Are Saying About the Alex Pretti Shooting
Minnesota Officials Looking to Prosecute ICE Agents Over Fatal Shootings – Here's What...
Donald Trump and Tim Walz Have a Phone Conversation About Immigration Policy
Was a Washington Man Just Stabbed Because of His Christian Faith?
Tim Walz Just Got Called Out by the Holocaust Museum
Tennis Stars Shut Down Reporter Who Asked This Ridiculous Question
It's the Control: What Dems Really Mean When They Say 'Healthcare'
Why ICE and Minnesota Dominated the Conversation Last Week — and What the...
Venezuela’s Opposition Leader Says Democracy in Venezuela Could Be Trump's Berlin Wall Mom...
Top Chinese General Accused of Leaking Nuclear Secrets to the US
Scott Bessent Blasts Canadian PM Mark Carney for Cutting a Deal With China
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos