Joe Manchin Had the Perfect Reaction to This Survey About the Dems
Massachusetts Beach Town Essentially Banned American Flags for the Dumbest Reason
Colorado Dems Brace for a Socialist Earthquake Tonight, With All Eyes on This...
Is This a Dead Giveaway of Bad News to Come on the Birthright...
Oregon Is Telling Voters Not to Worry About This Insane Ballot Initiative. That's...
We Should Watch the Dems Eat Each Other...and Get the Panicans to Pass...
Chuck Schumer's Numbers Might Explain Why Democratic Socialists are Winning Primaries
The Supreme Court Just Ruled to Protect Women's Sports
Ahead of America's 250th Anniversary, Barack Obama Smears the Founding Fathers
Lefty Journo Tries Dunking on Great American State Fair Attendance, Gets Wrecked by...
Israel Banned Palestinian Workers, and America's Leftist Media Is Hardest Hit
AOC Launches Another Insane Attack on Elon Musk's Wealth
The DSA Admits Full-Blown Communism Is Its Endgame
Bernie Sanders Bangs the Climate Change Drum Over Normal Summer Weather
President Trump Is Demanding Lower Gas Prices
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement