New Business Steps Up After LGBTQ Club Bows to Pressure Over Iryna Zarutska...
Here's What Voters are Most Concerned About Heading Into the Midterms
Scott Jennings Reminds Us There's No Moral Equivalence Between Iran and the U.S.
Did Wisconsin's Liberal Supreme Court Candidate Just Violate Electioneering Laws?
Antisemitic Activism Is on the Rise in America's Public Schools
DOJ to Probe Mamdani's 'Fishy' Racial Equity Plan
The Bulls Made a Mistake Cutting Jaden Ivey and Now They're Facing the...
Why Are Wisconsin Democrats Defending This Islamic Terrorist?
Boston Sent a Social Worker to Deal With a Violent Situation and It...
President Trump Said the Iranian Regime Ends Tonight
If I Were Them… I’d Just Do What He Says
Don't Worry Guys, This Dem Rep. Says He Can End The Iran War...
President Trump Doubles Down on His Deadline For Iran: '8 PM is Happening'
Iran Deploys Human Shields Including Children to Key Infrastructure Ahead of US Strikes
President Trump and Marco Rubio Move to Revoke The Visas of Iranian Elites...
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos