Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
We Got Him: Brown University Shooter Found Dead in New Hampshire
Trump Just Made a Game-Changing Move on Marijuana
This Is What AOC Had to Say About That Poll Saying She Could...
Venezuelan Navy Escorting Oil Tankers Amid Trump's Blockade Order
Judge Hannah Dugan Found Guilty of Felony Obstruction, Not Guilty of Misdemeanor Charge
Obamacare's Broken Promises
ABC Journalist Denies the Religious Reality of the Bondi Beach Terror Attack
Defending Education Files Civil Rights Complaint Against Seattle Public Schools
Ben Shapiro Blasts Tucker Carlson in Blistering Speech at the Heritage Foundation
54 Charged in Nationwide ATM Jackpotting Scheme Linked to Venezuelan Terror Group
Boston Man Faces Up to 20 Years After Guilty Plea in Gang Drug...
Federal Grand Jury Indicts Springfield Man on PPP Fraud, Money Laundering Charges
ABC News Under Fire for Framing SNAP Fraud Suspects as 'Massachusetts Men'
Two Boston Store Owners Charged in Alleged Multi-Million-Dollar SNAP Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects DOJ's Request to Seal Entire Mar-a-Lago Search Affidavit

AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee

A federal judge formally rejected the Department of Justice’s request to keep the affidavit that led to the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago sealed due to “the intense public and historical interest in an unprecedented search of a former President’s residence.”

Advertisement

The Biden administration argued “the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal,” but Judge Bruce Reinhart, who cleared the initial search warrant, said in a 13-page ruling issued Monday that the government had not given a strong enough argument for that request.

“I was — and am — satisfied that the facts sworn by the affiant are reliable,” Reinhart said in the order

Reinhart ruled last week that he would consider unsealing portions of the affidavit after conferring with the Justice Department and determining whether proposed redactions would be sufficient to protect the ongoing criminal investigation connected to the search. But in his order, Reinhart emphasized that he may ultimately agree with prosecutors that any redactions would be so extensive that they would render the document useless.

“I cannot say at this point that partial redactions will be so extensive that they will result in a meaningless disclosure, but I may ultimately reach that conclusion after hearing further from the Government,” Reinhart wrote.

The new order underlines the historic significance of a typically secret part of the criminal investigative process, arriving just as Trump has indicated he’s preparing to mount his own attack on the FBI investigation in court. The Justice Department is due to propose potential redactions by Thursday, portending a potentially lengthy process of negotiation with Reinhart and possible appeals. (Politico)

Advertisement

“I therefore reject the Government’s argument that the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal,” he said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement