Bill Maher Offers a Simple Explanation for Why He Trashes the Left More...
Trump Continues to Increase His Lead Over Harris in Latest Electoral College Projection
Did You Miss This Damning Article About Kamala Harris on Axios?
Trump Spills What He'll Never Do Again If Elected Again
Why the SAVE Act terrifies Democrats
Josh Shapiro Warns Dems Not to 'Underestimate' Trump's Debate Skills
This Small Ohio Town Is Being Overrun By illegal Haitian Immigrants
U.S. Cuts Another Massive Check to Ukraine
Netanyahu Fears Hamas Will Smuggle Hostages Into Iran
Wait Until You Hear Joe Scarborough's Latest Lunacy Claim
Teacher Who Refused to Refer to Students by 'Preferred Pronouns' Jailed for the...
Trump Announces a Role for Dr. Ben Carson In His Administration
Longtime Democrat Alan Dershowitz Leaves His Party: 'Absolutely Disgusted'
Tim Walz Won't Like This Attraction That Drew Crowds at His Own State...
Antisemitism From the Right
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects DOJ's Request to Seal Entire Mar-a-Lago Search Affidavit

AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee

A federal judge formally rejected the Department of Justice’s request to keep the affidavit that led to the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago sealed due to “the intense public and historical interest in an unprecedented search of a former President’s residence.”

Advertisement

The Biden administration argued “the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal,” but Judge Bruce Reinhart, who cleared the initial search warrant, said in a 13-page ruling issued Monday that the government had not given a strong enough argument for that request.

“I was — and am — satisfied that the facts sworn by the affiant are reliable,” Reinhart said in the order

Reinhart ruled last week that he would consider unsealing portions of the affidavit after conferring with the Justice Department and determining whether proposed redactions would be sufficient to protect the ongoing criminal investigation connected to the search. But in his order, Reinhart emphasized that he may ultimately agree with prosecutors that any redactions would be so extensive that they would render the document useless.

“I cannot say at this point that partial redactions will be so extensive that they will result in a meaningless disclosure, but I may ultimately reach that conclusion after hearing further from the Government,” Reinhart wrote.

The new order underlines the historic significance of a typically secret part of the criminal investigative process, arriving just as Trump has indicated he’s preparing to mount his own attack on the FBI investigation in court. The Justice Department is due to propose potential redactions by Thursday, portending a potentially lengthy process of negotiation with Reinhart and possible appeals. (Politico)

Advertisement

“I therefore reject the Government’s argument that the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal,” he said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement