Top Medical Association Reverses Course on 'Gender-Affirming Care' for Children
Jacob Frey Is Reacting Exactly As You'd Expect After Tom Homan Announces ICE...
36,500 Feared Dead in Iran, ACLJ Takes Urgent Action at the U.N.
Chuck Schumer Claims Most Black People Support Jim Crow
Here's How Much Bernie Sanders Spent on Private Jets While Fighting Climate Change
California School Board Member Loses It Over the Word 'Homeless'
Leftist Judge Appointed by Biden Is the Latest Activist to Block Trump’s Immigration...
Federal Authorities Arrest Antifa Terrorist Who Threatened ICE Agents
Journalist David Hoch Testified Before Congress About Minnesota Fraud. Here's What He Said...
What's the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Hiding?
Spanberger Ends Virginia State Police Agreement to Cooperate With ICE
New Mexico Bill Banning Majority of Semi-Auto Rifles Advances
Senator Moreno Blasts CNBC’s Resident Leftist Andrew Sorkin Over Too Late Powell
Lone Republican Steve Hilton Emerges As the Surprise Winner of the California Governor...
Border Czar Tom Homan Slams the Left for Using Children in Anti-ICE Political...
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects DOJ's Request to Seal Entire Mar-a-Lago Search Affidavit

AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee

A federal judge formally rejected the Department of Justice’s request to keep the affidavit that led to the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago sealed due to “the intense public and historical interest in an unprecedented search of a former President’s residence.”

Advertisement

The Biden administration argued “the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal,” but Judge Bruce Reinhart, who cleared the initial search warrant, said in a 13-page ruling issued Monday that the government had not given a strong enough argument for that request.

“I was — and am — satisfied that the facts sworn by the affiant are reliable,” Reinhart said in the order

Reinhart ruled last week that he would consider unsealing portions of the affidavit after conferring with the Justice Department and determining whether proposed redactions would be sufficient to protect the ongoing criminal investigation connected to the search. But in his order, Reinhart emphasized that he may ultimately agree with prosecutors that any redactions would be so extensive that they would render the document useless.

“I cannot say at this point that partial redactions will be so extensive that they will result in a meaningless disclosure, but I may ultimately reach that conclusion after hearing further from the Government,” Reinhart wrote.

The new order underlines the historic significance of a typically secret part of the criminal investigative process, arriving just as Trump has indicated he’s preparing to mount his own attack on the FBI investigation in court. The Justice Department is due to propose potential redactions by Thursday, portending a potentially lengthy process of negotiation with Reinhart and possible appeals. (Politico)

Advertisement

“I therefore reject the Government’s argument that the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal,” he said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement