The Court Didn't Officially Do This to the Voting Right Act, But Liberals...
The White House's Picture of Trump and King Charles III Induced a Glorious...
Following SCOTUS Decision, Louisiana Is Wasting No Time Redrawing Its Maps
VP Vance Had the Perfect Analogy for Tim Walz After He Tried to...
Grand Jury Indicts Anti-ICE Protesters Who Assaulted Conservative Journalist
United Pilot's Facebook Header Could Get Him Grounded
Jasmine Crockett Wants Everyone to Know She's Better Than We Are
Vermont Christian School Wins Suit Against State After Being Punished for Trans Athlete...
The 'Devout Catholic' Biden Administration's DOJ Made a Point of Targeting Nuns
Listen to Justice Alito Absolutely Hammer the Lawyer for Haitian Nationals
UCLA Is in Hot Water Over Free Speech, and Here's Why
More Than a Year After the LA Fires, Newsom Is Still 'Clarifying' the...
This Family Lost Their Daughter to an Illegal Alien, and This Is the...
President Trump Is Considering Pulling Troops From Germany Amid Tensions With NATO Countri...
Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei Just Issued a New Threat
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement