This Is How Democrats Will Take Revenge on Trump If They Win the...
Lindsey Graham Wants Trump to 'Take' Kharg Island – Here's What Could Happen
Jillian Michaels Destroyed a Body Positivity Activist With Science
CBS News Radio Is Signing Off for Good
Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin Is Still Blocking DHS Funding
As Iran Executes More Protesters, the 'Genocide' Left's Silence Is Deafening
Legendary Martial Artist, Actor, and American Myth Chuck Norris Dead at 86
The Australian Prime Minister Just Learned Appeasing Islam Doesn't Work
NBC News Digs Up 'Experts' to Claim We're Losing in Iran
What Happened to 'Bake the Cake'? Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders Booted From Arkansas...
Mamdani's Eid Mubarak Celebration Isn't Going Over Well
The Naked Emperor of Election Integrity
Democrat Is Shocked to Learn CA Bans Voter ID Requirements
Netanyahu Responds to Allegations That Israel Forced Trump's Hand in Launching Operation E...
Democrats Likely Won’t Vote for Delilah’s Law. Here’s Why They Undeniably Should.
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement