Wait, That's Why Wes Moore Attacked The Baltimore Sun Today?!
Trump Dropped Some Bombs Tonight, But Not on the Iranians
A School Shooter Thought He Would Kill Children – This Heroic Principal Had...
FTC Drops the Hammer on Popular Dating App for Sharing User Data and...
Striking Journalists Demand Readers Stop Reading Their Journalism; CNN Prevents Good News...
Video Shows Worker Starting a Massive Warehouse Fire In Ontario, California
You Can’t Have It Both Ways: Fetterman Blasts Democrats For Their Hypocrisy on...
Illegal Immigrant Found Guilty on 9 Counts of Assault for Groping Teenage Girls...
Florida Man Sentenced to 5 Years for $4.5M Military Fuel Fraud
Border Patrol Arrests Four British Nationals for Illegal Entry from Canada into Maine
Dearborn Heights Business Owner Pleads Guilty in $1.9M Healthcare Fraud Scheme
$12M Frozen, $33M Under Investigation in Global Crypto Sweep
Seven Illegal Immigrants Charged in $1.5M Multi-State Burglary Ring Targeting Homes
Haitian Illegal Alien Allegedly Beat Mother to Death With Hammer Outside of Florida...
Man Who Allegedly Faked Feeding Children Gets 3.5 Years in Prison, Ordered to...
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement