Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO That Brings HIV-Positive 'Migrants' to America
Anti-ICE Protesters Are Stalking Federal Employees in Minneapolis
Newsweek Runs Headline on Story It Calls Unverified, and the Press Dumping on...
'They Just Care About Power.' Scott Jennings Lays Out What Virginia Redistricting Was...
California Sees Drop in Homicides. There's A Reason for That and Leftists Won't...
Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Critique of Israeli Aid and Some People's Odd Obsession With...
A Virginia Circuit Court Has Just Ruled The State's New Congressional Map Unconstitutional
Here's Why The Situation In Iran is Looking Disastrous For China
Pennsylvania Woman Accused of Selling Pandemic Unemployment Approvals to Ineligible Claima...
New York Times Podcast Calls Shoplifting 'Political Protest' and Defends the Killing of...
Trump's Chief of Staff Reportedly Tells Cabinet Members to Focus on Domestic Issues...
High-Tech Car Thieves Used Key Fob Devices to Steal Over 130 Vehicles, Feds...
Navy Secretary Phelan Exits Administration Immediately, Is Replaced With Hung Cao
DOJ Files Complaint Against DC Water Over 200-Million-Gallon Sewage Spill into Potomac Riv...
Five Romanians Charged in $1M Scheme to Steal SNAP Benefits From Low-Income Families...
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement