John Thune Fumes After Getting Roasted by Karoline Leavitt Over His Incompetence
Oh, So That Explains These Wild Paragraphs About Caitlin Clark in That USA...
The Left-Wing Unicorn Hunt for the White Male Working-Class Voter
WisDems File a Lawsuit to Allow Absentee Voters to Cast a New Ballot
More Evidence How Facts Are Not Proof for the Press; Caitlin Clark's Fouls...
There's a Hidden Left-Wing Network Powering the 'Conservative' Rebellion Against Data Cent...
The Opposite of Diversity Is University
Mamdani Makes It Clear He Believes International Law Trumps US Sovereignty
The AP Blames US Aid Cuts for the Plight of Trans Sex Workers...
Trump: Iran Will Pay for Ship Damage With Its Own Frozen Funds
Massachusetts Woman Charged in $10 Million Ponzi Scheme That Burned 200 Investors
Trump Cracks Jokes, Reveals 'Little Bet' During Dodgers White House Visit
Oklahoma Chiropractor Convicted in $30 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
Spanberger's Virginia Allowed Another Illegal Alien to Assault and Murder a Child
Mexican National Sentenced for Orchestrating Fake Robberies to Score U-Visas
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement