Oh, Now the Feminists Are Trying to Ruin Team USA's Gold Medal Win...
This CNN Host Addressed an Issue That Liberals DO NOT Want to Talk...
Kash Patel Celebrated With Team USA at the Winter Olympics. Was It a...
Someone Shouted the N-Word at the BAFTAs. It's Created a Total Fiasco on...
We Saw the Greatest Olympic Win Since 1980s Miracle on Ice...and the Libs...
Director of DC Dept of Environment Literally Wants to Infect You With E....
Iran's Supreme Leader Is Getting His Affairs in Order As US Prepares to...
Hawaii Residents Should Be Terrified to Find Out What Will Happen If These...
President Trump Honors Angel Families in Moving White House Remembrance Ceremony
Savannah Guthrie Announces $1M Reward for Information That Leads to the Recovery of...
Trans Violence Is No Joke
A Judge Called This CA Serial Sex Abuser a 'Monster.' Thanks to Gavin...
Here's How the 'Warmth of Collectivism' Treats New York's Finest
Guess What This Oregon Democrat Called Trump's 'Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act'
Greg Gutfeld Rips Gavin Newsom for His 'Stupid Signaling' to Georgia Voters
Tipsheet
Premium

Timing of Edit to WHO Page on Vaccinating Children Raises Questions About Big Tech Influence

Timing of Edit to WHO Page on Vaccinating Children Raises Questions About Big Tech Influence
AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

For as many faults as the World Health Organization (WHO) has, it ought to be commended for taking a different approach to children amid the coronavirus pandemic than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Particularly, it never advised children two and up to be masked as the CDC did. Given the "psychosocial and developmental milestones" in young children, the WHO recommended kids five and under don't wear them and those between 6-11 to only use them under certain conditions. 

Similarly, until very recently, the WHO also advised against vaccinating children "for the moment."

Behold, its very reasonable position: "There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults."

Then something strange happened. Its tune changed a bit, which happened to coincide with Big Tech not liking this recommendation very much. 

Gone is the big headline that read, "Children should not be vaccinated for the moment." In its place is this: 

Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.   

More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.

WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has concluded that the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above. Children aged between 12 and 15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups for vaccination.

Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy. (WHO)

The Science is just rapidly evolving, I'm sure. Meanwhile, the CDC is having its emergency meeting this week to discuss the COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents, particularly discussing reports of myocarditis after receiving the mRNA vaccines. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos