Let's Break Down What Happened With the Bondi Subpoena This Week
The Daily Mail Steps in It Over Shameful Markwayne Mullin Confirmation Hearing Piece
Lisa Murkowski Pitched This Weak Sauce Exemption to the SAVE Act. You're Going...
You Won't Believe Why Democrats are Trying to Kick Chicago Residents Out of...
Police Arrest Man Who Claimed to Be Roblox Programmer for Possessing Child Abuse...
Ron DeSantis Questions Why TSA Exists
Do Democrats Think We're Stupid?
Sen. Markwayne Mullin Set To Be Confirmed As New Head of DHS
L.A. Man Accused of Using Bogus Firms to Score $2M in COVID Relief...
Azerbaijani National Who Is At-Large Charged in $90M Medicare Fraud Scheme
The 17,000 Day War
This New Report Shows Just How Much We're Winning on Immigration
Trump Just Made a Major Move After Democrats Crossed His Red Line
Ken Paxton Returns Fire With a New Ad Targeting John Cornyn
What Tim Pool Says on God’s Omnipotence and the Laws of Logic
Tipsheet

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Pollster Patrick Basham explained during an interview with Fox News’s Mark Levin why he believes Joe Biden’s supposed election victory, while “not statistically impossible,” is “statistically implausible.”

Advertisement

Basham said during the interview that aired Sunday that he looked at numerous “non-polling metrics,” which have a “100 percent accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election,” to come to his conclusion. 

“Something very strange has happened because the numbers just don't add up,” he said referring to the election results. 

Some of the “dozen or more” metrics include “party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls.” 

He said these metrics pointed to a Trump victory in 2016 and “that was again the case in 2020.”

“So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate ... for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others,” Basham explained.

The founding director of the Democracy Institute said if 100 observers were only shown the “vote breakdown by demographic group” on election night, 99 “would say, well, obviously, Trump.”

Basham also called into question the ballot rejection rate for absentee and mail-in ballots, which he said was “historically low.”

Advertisement

“Rejection rates, which in the primaries earlier this year were well into the double-digits and which historically have often been very, very high in these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, we're seeing rejection rates of less than 1 percent, often very close to to zero,” he noted. “Given the increase in absentee balloting and the lack of experience that most of the new voters and those doing the counting would have with those ballots, it is implausible, to put it politely, that that figure would be as low as it was.”

President Trump agreed with the pollster’s analysis.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement