Sanctions Against Anti-Israel UN Official Go Into Effect
Federal Judges Just Ruled on Biden's Request to Conceal Ghostwriter Tapes
This Is Why You Should Never Leave Joe Biden Alone on a Stage
Democrats Weaponized Race for Years. A New Poll Just Showed It Might Be...
Trump DOJ Targets Hundreds of Naturalized Criminals Who Concealed Sex Abuse and Fraud...
Even Democrat Judges Think This District Attorney Is Too Soft on Crime
Italy's Prime Minister Is Not Happy With President Trump
USDA Uncovers Hundreds of Thousands of SNAP Fraud Cases as Blue States Continue...
Zohran Mamdani Just Set the Tone for the Democratic Party’s Future
The AI Boom Is Set to Make Blue-Collar Jobs More Critical Than Ever
Illegal Alien from Chile Sentenced to 45 Months for Multi-State Identity Theft Scheme
U.S. Destroys Australia 2-0 to Secure Spot in World Cup Knockout Rounds
Michigan Man Pleads Guilty to $2.7 Million Investment Fraud Scheme
John Cornyn Continues His Curiously Militant Opposition to the SAVE Act
DOJ Launches Investigation Into Major League Baseball for Targeting of Christians
Tipsheet

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Pollster Patrick Basham explained during an interview with Fox News’s Mark Levin why he believes Joe Biden’s supposed election victory, while “not statistically impossible,” is “statistically implausible.”

Advertisement

Basham said during the interview that aired Sunday that he looked at numerous “non-polling metrics,” which have a “100 percent accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election,” to come to his conclusion. 

“Something very strange has happened because the numbers just don't add up,” he said referring to the election results. 

Some of the “dozen or more” metrics include “party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls.” 

He said these metrics pointed to a Trump victory in 2016 and “that was again the case in 2020.”

“So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate ... for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others,” Basham explained.

The founding director of the Democracy Institute said if 100 observers were only shown the “vote breakdown by demographic group” on election night, 99 “would say, well, obviously, Trump.”

Basham also called into question the ballot rejection rate for absentee and mail-in ballots, which he said was “historically low.”

Advertisement

“Rejection rates, which in the primaries earlier this year were well into the double-digits and which historically have often been very, very high in these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, we're seeing rejection rates of less than 1 percent, often very close to to zero,” he noted. “Given the increase in absentee balloting and the lack of experience that most of the new voters and those doing the counting would have with those ballots, it is implausible, to put it politely, that that figure would be as low as it was.”

President Trump agreed with the pollster’s analysis.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement