Cut the Waste. Not America’s Strength.
High Honors for the Left, Crickets for the Right
Sacrifice for the Cause
Coal Has Evolved. America Should Compete.
Applying 'Peace Through Strength' to Affordability: A Key to President Trump’s Wider Agend...
Reconciling America
Could Evil Netflix Still Devour Warner Bros.? Stranger Things...Has Happened!
'What’s Your Favorite Type of Abortion?' How to Win the Abortion Debate
Applying 'America First' to Avoid Moral Hazard
The CCP Doesn’t Need a Spy – It Just Needs Your Continuous Glucose...
Judge Allows Cameras in Charlie Kirk Murder Trial
Mexican National Faces Up to 15 Years for Running Alien Smuggling Operation Across...
Treasury Sanctions 10 Entities Across Middle East, Asia, and Europe Over Iran Arms...
New USDA Rule Will Demand SNAP Stores Stock More 'Real Food'
Could Courts Overturn California's Congressional Map Next? This Senator Thinks So.
Tipsheet

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Pollster Patrick Basham explained during an interview with Fox News’s Mark Levin why he believes Joe Biden’s supposed election victory, while “not statistically impossible,” is “statistically implausible.”

Advertisement

Basham said during the interview that aired Sunday that he looked at numerous “non-polling metrics,” which have a “100 percent accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election,” to come to his conclusion. 

“Something very strange has happened because the numbers just don't add up,” he said referring to the election results. 

Some of the “dozen or more” metrics include “party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls.” 

He said these metrics pointed to a Trump victory in 2016 and “that was again the case in 2020.”

“So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate ... for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others,” Basham explained.

The founding director of the Democracy Institute said if 100 observers were only shown the “vote breakdown by demographic group” on election night, 99 “would say, well, obviously, Trump.”

Basham also called into question the ballot rejection rate for absentee and mail-in ballots, which he said was “historically low.”

Advertisement

“Rejection rates, which in the primaries earlier this year were well into the double-digits and which historically have often been very, very high in these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, we're seeing rejection rates of less than 1 percent, often very close to to zero,” he noted. “Given the increase in absentee balloting and the lack of experience that most of the new voters and those doing the counting would have with those ballots, it is implausible, to put it politely, that that figure would be as low as it was.”

President Trump agreed with the pollster’s analysis.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement