Oh, You Knew This View Co-Host Was Going to Go There Regarding Marco...
The Socialist Who Recruited Graham Platner Was Banned from This Dem Rep's Campaign....
The Timing of These Dem Campaign Fund Reallocations Is a Bit Peculiar Regarding...
Joe & Mika Display Platner Denialism; Time Magazine Zeroes in on the Big...
The Usual Suspects Are Attacking Queen Camilla for Meeting With J.K. Rowling
The FCC Chair Casts Doubt on ABC's Claim That 'The View' Is a...
Scott Jennings Says Clean Voter Rolls Are Just Common Sense
Gavin Newsom Got Testy With Reporters Who Asked About His Tax Returns
Two NYC Churches Were Firebombed, and Zohran Mamdani's Hasn't Said a Word
Abdul El-Sayed's HQ Account Thought Slamming Haley Stevens for Honoring Charlie Kirk Was...
This Is the One Chart Democrats Won’t Want You to See
Treasury Slaps Sanctions on Iran Supreme Leader's Personal Banker
Platner Officially Calls It Quits – But Exits With a Profane Far-Left Message
Charlotte Auto Theft Ring Leader Sentenced to 8 Years for Stealing Over 100...
EXCLUSIVE: Attempted Murderer, Convicted Rapist Arrested by ICE
Tipsheet

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Pollster Patrick Basham explained during an interview with Fox News’s Mark Levin why he believes Joe Biden’s supposed election victory, while “not statistically impossible,” is “statistically implausible.”

Advertisement

Basham said during the interview that aired Sunday that he looked at numerous “non-polling metrics,” which have a “100 percent accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election,” to come to his conclusion. 

“Something very strange has happened because the numbers just don't add up,” he said referring to the election results. 

Some of the “dozen or more” metrics include “party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls.” 

He said these metrics pointed to a Trump victory in 2016 and “that was again the case in 2020.”

“So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate ... for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others,” Basham explained.

The founding director of the Democracy Institute said if 100 observers were only shown the “vote breakdown by demographic group” on election night, 99 “would say, well, obviously, Trump.”

Basham also called into question the ballot rejection rate for absentee and mail-in ballots, which he said was “historically low.”

Advertisement

“Rejection rates, which in the primaries earlier this year were well into the double-digits and which historically have often been very, very high in these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, we're seeing rejection rates of less than 1 percent, often very close to to zero,” he noted. “Given the increase in absentee balloting and the lack of experience that most of the new voters and those doing the counting would have with those ballots, it is implausible, to put it politely, that that figure would be as low as it was.”

President Trump agreed with the pollster’s analysis.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement