Put Dems on the Spot With Small but Popular Affordability Hacks
Is This Why There's Little to No Video Footage of the Brown University...
Trump Spoke to a Constitutional Lawyer About a Third Term. This Is Going...
The Washington Post Interviewed Tyler Robinson's Friends. They Confirmed What We Already K...
Nick Reiner Once Wrecked Family Home During Meth-Induced Rage Fest
Here's Where Things Got Uncomfortable During the Brown University Shooting Presser
This Black Man Who Befriended KKK Members Might Just Have the Answer America...
Democrats Dump on Trump's Warrior Dividend Payments
It Seems Biden's FBI Hid Stats Showing Armed Civilians Stopped Criminal Shooters
From the Kia Boys to Kia Lawsuits: How Democrats Got Crime Backward
Did Australia Just Thwart Another Islamic Terror Attack?
A New Poll Shows AOC Beating Vance in 2028. There's Just One Problem
Trump’s Numbers Tell the Truth—The Media Still Won’t
Inflation Comes in Light Beating Forecasts and Easing Pressure on Families
Loss, Survival, Resilience, and Contemporary Antisemitism 15 Years After She Was Attacked...
Tipsheet

Patrick Basham Lays Out Why He Believes Biden's Election Win Is 'Statistically Implausible'

Pollster Patrick Basham explained during an interview with Fox News’s Mark Levin why he believes Joe Biden’s supposed election victory, while “not statistically impossible,” is “statistically implausible.”

Advertisement

Basham said during the interview that aired Sunday that he looked at numerous “non-polling metrics,” which have a “100 percent accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election,” to come to his conclusion. 

“Something very strange has happened because the numbers just don't add up,” he said referring to the election results. 

Some of the “dozen or more” metrics include “party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls.” 

He said these metrics pointed to a Trump victory in 2016 and “that was again the case in 2020.”

“So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate ... for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others,” Basham explained.

The founding director of the Democracy Institute said if 100 observers were only shown the “vote breakdown by demographic group” on election night, 99 “would say, well, obviously, Trump.”

Basham also called into question the ballot rejection rate for absentee and mail-in ballots, which he said was “historically low.”

Advertisement

“Rejection rates, which in the primaries earlier this year were well into the double-digits and which historically have often been very, very high in these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, we're seeing rejection rates of less than 1 percent, often very close to to zero,” he noted. “Given the increase in absentee balloting and the lack of experience that most of the new voters and those doing the counting would have with those ballots, it is implausible, to put it politely, that that figure would be as low as it was.”

President Trump agreed with the pollster’s analysis.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos