Yes, Georgia Is Having a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps, but You...
Finally, We Can Turn the Page on Too Late Powell
Let's Not Forget About Left-Wing Violence
Press Is Attacking Pratt, Ignoring the Dems Attacking Courts, and Overlooking the IdiAOC...
Here's Another Woke Judge Putting Criminals Ahead of Public Safety
Here's More From Xavier Becerra's Embarrassing Interview With KTLA
JD Vance Announces the White House Fraud Task Force's Latest Move to Stop...
LOL: Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Now Claims He Wanted Biden to Close...
China: Our Enemy, Not Our Rival
Six-Month Freeze: CMS Blocks New Medicare Enrollments for Hospice and Home Health Agencies...
DOJ Announces $30M Settlement to End PayPal’s 'Illegal DEI Lending Program'
New Poll Shows Abdul El-Sayed Leading Michigan Democrat U.S. Senate Primary
Leader of 'Maniac Murder Cult' Gets 15 Years for Plotting Poison Candy Attack...
Nearly 700 Fake Claims, $11 Million Stolen: Illinois Woman Found Guilty of COVID-19...
SNAP Crackdown: Mississippi Man Latest in Family Fraud Spree to Plead Guilty
Tipsheet
Premium

Gregg Jarrett Has an Important Reminder for the Media About the Trump Campaign's Evidence of Voter Fraud

Gregg Jarrett Has an Important Reminder for the Media About the Trump Campaign's Evidence of Voter Fraud

As Matt reported earlier today, Fox News's Tucker Carlson appeared to grow frustrated with Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell for refusing to provide evidence of the allegation that massive voter fraud took place in the election. Powell later explained she sent Carlson an affidavit that she hadn't even attached to a pleading yet and offered to provide him with a witness to discuss the numbers. He, in turn, was "insulting, demanding, and rude," she said.

Carlson hasn't been the only one to press the Trump campaign for evidence. Plenty of other members of the media have largely dismissed the claims from the campaign for the same reason.

But speaking on Sean Hannity's program Thursday night, Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett reminded the media that they are not entitled to see evidence before it's presented before a court.

"Well, the unabashed arrogance of the media was on full display today, as they were demanding to see the evidence. They are not entitled to see the evidence. Evidence is presented in a court of law, eyewitnesses, affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury," he explained. "That is how the legal process goes. So as Giuliani pointed out, he has to go state by state. It takes time. It's taken two weeks to gather that evidence, and now he is going about the arduous task of presenting it judge by judge, jurisdiction by jurisdiction. But look, where you have blank ballots that are assigned names, thousands of them, and then filled in with votes, when you have thousands of backdated ballots, when you have ballots that don’t match valid voters, when you have ballots that don’t match signatures, and importantly, where you have the integrity of voting machines and the critical software called into serious question because there is a backdoor that allows tens of thousands of votes to be transferred from one candidate to another instantaneously, with the click of a mouse or the stroke of a keyboard, these need to be looked at in a court of law. That is how the process works."

Jarrett said the media can and should be working to ascertain whether there was widespread fraud in the election, but they won't do that since they want Biden to win.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement