Trump Effect: A Democratic Stronghold in Florida Just Flipped
Trump Just Made a Wild Claim About Biden's Immigration Policies – And He's...
Trump Says Thomas Massie Should Be Ousted – Massie Spills the Tea on...
Pete Hegseth Just Launched an Investigation That May Change Everything We Know About...
Eric Swalwell’s Latest Anti-Trump Tantrum Might Be His Most Embarrassing Yet
Trump Administration Just Escalated Its Feud With Harvard
America, the Middle East, and Donald Trump
SCOTUS Restores Censured Maine State Rep. Laurel Libby's Right to Vote on Behalf...
There Looks to Be a Pattern of Democrats Throwing Biden Under the Bus...
U.S. Steel-Nippon Merger Prospect Still Alive and Well
Did You Catch Rubio’s Mic Drop Moment at Today’s Senate Hearing?
Oof: The Polling Is Not Getting Better for Democrats
Watch As Scott Jennings Calls Out Liberal Co-Panelist on CNN for Her 'but...
Hillary Clinton Calls Out the Encouragement of More Children. Here's Who She Says...
There's Been an Update in the DOGE and US Institute of Peace Saga
Tipsheet

MSNBC Cuts to Commercial Break As Trump's Counsel Asked What Framers Would Think of a Partisan Impeachment

AP Photo/Chris Pizzello, File

MSNBC cut to a commercial break as soon as President Trump’s legal defense team took the microphone to answer a question about how the Framers would view partisan impeachment.

Advertisement

Reading a question from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and some of his colleagues, Chief Justice John Roberts said: “How would the Framers view removing a president without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and on the basis of articles of impeachment supported by one political party and opposed by the other?”

The network apparently didn’t want its viewers to hear how White House defense attorney Alan Dershowitz would answer that one.

Dershowitz went on to say Alexander Hamilton directly addressed this concern and he believed the Framers would be “appalled” by how the impeachment of President Trump has been carried out.

“Alexander Hamilton] said the greatest danger of impeachment is if it turns on the votes of one party being greater than the voters of the other party in either house. So I think they would be appalled to see an impeachment going forward in violation of the Schumer rule and the rules of other congressmen that were good enough for us during the Clinton impeachment but seem to have changed dramatically in the current situation,” said Dershowitz, a liberal Democrat.

He then argued that the House of Representatives has acted as if it is above the law.

Advertisement

“The criteria that have been set out are so lawless they basically paraphrase Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) who said ‘there is no law – anything the House wants to do to impeach is impeachable.’ That’s what’s happened today. That places the House of Representatives above the law,” Dershowitz said. “The House of Representatives is not above the law…to use that criteria that it’s whatever the House says it is, whatever the Senate says it is, turns those bodies into lawless bodies in violation of the intent of the Framers.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement