It Is Right and Proper to Laugh at the Suffering of Journalists
Here's the GOP Rep Whose Lightning Round of Questioning Wrecked the Biden DOJ
This Canadian News Outlet's Segment on the Recent School Shooting Makes MS Now...
CNN's Scott Jennings Wrecks a Lib Guest's Narrative on Election Integrity With a...
The Nancy Guthrie Abduction Story Has Become the Willy Wonka Ferry Ride of...
Lady, What the Hell Were You Thinking Eating This Crab!?
David Axelrod's Lament of Skyrocketing ACA Premiums Is Undermined by David Axelrod
The Brilliant 'Reasoning' of the Left
The Decline of the Washington Post
Ingrates R’ Us
Jeffries and Schumer Denounce Trump's 'Racist' Video — but Who Are They to...
NYC Needs School Choice—Not ‘Green Schools’
Housing Affordability Is About Politics, Not Economics
Is It Cool to Be Unpatriotic? Perhaps — but It’s Also Ungrateful
A Chance Meeting With Richard Pryor — and Its Lasting Impact
Tipsheet

NYT Leaves Out a Pretty Important Piece of Information in Menendez Trial Story

The New York Times ran an article on Monday about Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez, who is facing a federal bribery trial, which is set to begin this week.

The Times did not shy away from the magnitude of his alleged crimes: “Mr. Menendez is charged with 12 corruption-related counts, including six counts of bribery and three counts of honest services fraud.”

Advertisement

Indeed, the defense for Mr. Menendez is unlikely to dispute some of the facts; that Dr. Salomon Melgen, a wealthy Florida ophthalmologist, bestowed on the senator lavish gifts of private flights, luxury accommodations and free vacations – all which Mr. Menendez initially failed to disclose — and he made more than $700,000 in direct and indirect political contributions to Mr. Menendez.

The legal case revolves around whether those gifts were permissible as gifts a friend could give to another, or whether they were part of a longstanding bribery arrangement where Mr. Menendez would intervene to protect the financial and personal interests of Dr. Melgen in return for his gifts and donations. (NYT)

Nor did the paper ignore the fact that he is up for re-election next year in its lengthy article.

But what was initially missing was that Menendez is a Democrat.

Twitter users were quick to call the paper out. 

Advertisement

The author of the story acknowledged the criticism and said it was just an “oversight.”

As you can guess, not that many people believed him.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement