LOL: Cornel West Thinks Gavin Newsom Has a White Supremacist Mindset
Transgender Charged After Shooting at Border Patrol in New Hampshire
Democrats Will Lose Their Minds After JD Vance's Announcement About Minnesota Fraud
Chinese Official Thought ChatGPT Was Private – Now We Know How China Silences...
They Spied on Kash Patel and Susie Wiles – Now They Are Paying...
Lawmakers Grappling With Potential Iran Airstrikes
Following Backlash, Pro-Abortion Professor Withdraws From Notre Dame Appointment
Where's the Backlash? Olympic Hockey Hero Gets a Warm Welcome in New Jersey
Utah Proposal for Citizen Carry Puts Pro-Teams in Crosshairs
Cuban Coast Guard Kills Four, Injures Six on Florida-Registered Speed Boat
Rep. Wesley Hunt Slams Gavin Newsom For His Racist Comments: 'You're Not Like...
If This CA City Elects This Man, It Will Be a New Low...
‘Tax the Jews’ Chants Erupt at San Francisco Mayor’s Tax Reform Press Conference
Report: No Deal yet Between U.S. and Iran Over Nuclear Weapons
Former Air Force Pilot Arrested Over Allegations That He Trained Chinese Military Pilots
Tipsheet

Senators Introduce Legislation Requiring Supreme Court to Televise Proceedings

Senators Introduce Legislation Requiring Supreme Court to Televise Proceedings

Transparency may finally be coming to the courtroom.

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) introduced legislation Thursday that would require the Supreme Court’s open proceedings to be televised, unless a majority vote by the Court rules that allowing cameras would violate the due process rights of a party before the Court.

Advertisement

“Decisions made by the Supreme Court impact the lives of all Americans in every corner of the country, but their proceedings often don't reach beyond the four walls of the court room.  And while we may disagree on the outcome of these cases, we can all agree that the American public deserves greater access to the arguments and decisions that will shape our society for years to come,” Durbin said in a statement.  “It’s time for the Supreme Court to embrace technology and transparency.” 

Grassley said the Cameras in the Courtroom Act of 2017 “would also expand the people’s understanding of our judicial system.”

The Cameras in the Courtroom Act only applies to open sessions of the Supreme Court – sessions where members of the public are already invited to observe in person, but often cannot because there are a very limited number of unreserved seats in the Courtroom.  Allowing public scrutiny of Supreme Court proceedings would produce greater accountability, transparency, and understanding of our judicial system. 

In 2016, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report highlighting the value of broadcasting video and audio coverage of Supreme Court and other appellate court proceedings.  The report cites stakeholders who state that the benefits of such coverage include enhancing public access to the courts, educating the public on the judiciary, and providing a useful window into how courts think about the issues in a case.

In 2012, the bill was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan vote of 11-7. The bill was also approved by the Committee on a bipartisan vote of 13-6 in 2010.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSPARENCY

The bipartisan legislation was introduced during “Sunshine Week,” a nationwide initiative marking the significance of public access to information.

Sens. Al Franken (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) cosponsored the bill. Companion legislation was also introduced in the House by Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) and Judge Ted Poe (R-TX).  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement