So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
The Latest Trump Move Involving Minneapolis Is Going to Trigger a Lib Meltdown
Here’s Why That ICE Agent Involved in the Minneapolis Shooting Is in Hiding
Latest NYT Piece on Mamdani Shows How Being an American Liberal Is Just...
Why the Hell Should We Care If Democrats Don’t?
Israel Misunderstood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 303: The Best of St. Paul
Frey: Let Minneapolis Get Back to Running Daycares
You Won't Believe What These Hotels Are Doing to ICE Agents
Trump Questions Why Minnesotans Are Harassing ICE, Civilians
Men Need to Work
Greenland and the Return of Great-Power Politics
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Tipsheet

Senators Introduce Legislation Requiring Supreme Court to Televise Proceedings

Transparency may finally be coming to the courtroom.

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) introduced legislation Thursday that would require the Supreme Court’s open proceedings to be televised, unless a majority vote by the Court rules that allowing cameras would violate the due process rights of a party before the Court.

Advertisement

“Decisions made by the Supreme Court impact the lives of all Americans in every corner of the country, but their proceedings often don't reach beyond the four walls of the court room.  And while we may disagree on the outcome of these cases, we can all agree that the American public deserves greater access to the arguments and decisions that will shape our society for years to come,” Durbin said in a statement.  “It’s time for the Supreme Court to embrace technology and transparency.” 

Grassley said the Cameras in the Courtroom Act of 2017 “would also expand the people’s understanding of our judicial system.”

The Cameras in the Courtroom Act only applies to open sessions of the Supreme Court – sessions where members of the public are already invited to observe in person, but often cannot because there are a very limited number of unreserved seats in the Courtroom.  Allowing public scrutiny of Supreme Court proceedings would produce greater accountability, transparency, and understanding of our judicial system. 

In 2016, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report highlighting the value of broadcasting video and audio coverage of Supreme Court and other appellate court proceedings.  The report cites stakeholders who state that the benefits of such coverage include enhancing public access to the courts, educating the public on the judiciary, and providing a useful window into how courts think about the issues in a case.

In 2012, the bill was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan vote of 11-7. The bill was also approved by the Committee on a bipartisan vote of 13-6 in 2010.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSPARENCY

The bipartisan legislation was introduced during “Sunshine Week,” a nationwide initiative marking the significance of public access to information.

Sens. Al Franken (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) cosponsored the bill. Companion legislation was also introduced in the House by Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) and Judge Ted Poe (R-TX).  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement